A49256:147
Short and plain animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dells sermon first preached before…Short and plaine animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dels sermon first preached before…
Short and plain animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dells sermon first preached before the Honourable House of Commons on Novemb. 25. 1646. But since printed without their order Setting forth the many dangerous and destructive assertions therein both to church and state, the covenant, and the reformation so much desired. Together, with an answer to an unlicensed pamphlet annexed to the sermon, entitled, A reply to Master Loves contradictions. By Christopher Love minister of Anne Aldersgate, London. The second edition. Imprimatur Ja. Cranford. Decemb. 17. 1646.Short and plaine animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dels sermon first preached before the Honourable House of Commons on Novemb. 25. 1646. But since printed without their order Setting forth the many dangerous and destructive assertions therein both to church and state, the covenant, and the reformation so much desired. Together, with an answer to an unlicensed pamphlet annext to the sermon, entituled, A reply to Master Loves contradictions. By Christopher Love minister of Anne Aldersgate, London. The second edition. Imprimatur Ja. Cranford. Decemb. 17. 1646.
London: printed by R. Cotes for John Bellamie, 1647London: printed by R. Cotes for Iohn Bellamie, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Minor. But Mr. Dell affirms spiritual Reformation excludes all other Reformation. Concl. Therefore mr. Dell is either blind or worse.
Minor. But Mr. Dell affirms spirituall Reformation excludes all other Reformation. Concl. Therefore mr. Dell is either blind or worse.
The Major Proposition is evident, Master Del himself confesseth it in the page fore quoted, p. 34.
The Minor is as evident, viz. that Mr Dell affirms spiritual Reformation, and excludes all other Reformation; for he saith expressly, That besides this spiritual Reformation he knows no other, Serm. page 5. line 2. and that this spiritual Reformation is the only Reformation of the New Testament, Serm. page 12. l. 22. what then follows, but that M. Dell is either blind or worse? And whereas you lay to my charge in ⟨p. 33⟩your Reply, That I should affirm the Reformation of Jesus Christ by his Word and Spirit in the faithful is no Reformation: Truly Sir, I never durst hold so, its far from my heart, I acknowledge heart-reformation to be the most glorious Reformation, yet not the only Reformation. I had thought you would have answered what I spake, and not unjustly fasten upon me what I spake not, but I perceive your tongue is your own.
The Minor is as evident, viz. that Mr Dell affirms spirituall Reformation, and excludes all other Reformation; for he saith expresly, That besides this spirituall Reformation he knows no other, Serm. page 5. line 2. and that this spirituall Reformation is the onely Reformation of the New Testament, Serm. page 12. l. 22. what then follows, but that M. Dell is either blind or worse? And whereas you lay to my charge in ⟨p. 33⟩