A49256:208
Short and plain animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dells sermon first preached before…Short and plaine animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dels sermon first preached before…
Short and plain animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dells sermon first preached before the Honourable House of Commons on Novemb. 25. 1646. But since printed without their order Setting forth the many dangerous and destructive assertions therein both to church and state, the covenant, and the reformation so much desired. Together, with an answer to an unlicensed pamphlet annexed to the sermon, entitled, A reply to Master Loves contradictions. By Christopher Love minister of Anne Aldersgate, London. The second edition. Imprimatur Ja. Cranford. Decemb. 17. 1646.Short and plaine animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dels sermon first preached before the Honourable House of Commons on Novemb. 25. 1646. But since printed without their order Setting forth the many dangerous and destructive assertions therein both to church and state, the covenant, and the reformation so much desired. Together, with an answer to an unlicensed pamphlet annext to the sermon, entituled, A reply to Master Loves contradictions. By Christopher Love minister of Anne Aldersgate, London. The second edition. Imprimatur Ja. Cranford. Decemb. 17. 1646.
London: printed by R. Cotes for John Bellamie, 1647London: printed by R. Cotes for Iohn Bellamie, 1647
Postscript: A Post-script, Vindicating the Author from many unjust aspersions cast upon him.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
A Post-script, Vindicating the Author from many unjust aspersions cast upon him.
Master Dell in his Epistle to the Honourable house of Commons, reports that I preached against the Articles at Oxford; which I did not, for when I desired the Honourable Worthies of Parliament to cast their eyes upon the University to reform it I did Premise this, that in what I should say I would no ways reflect on the Articles at Oxford? which being made (as I said) stands with the honour and justice of the Parliament to have them kept; was this to preach against the Articles?
MAster Dell in his Epistle to the Honourable house of Commons, reports that I preacht against the Articles at Oxford; which I did not, for when I desired the Honourable Worthies of Parliament to cast their eyes upon the Universitie to reform it I did Premise this, that in what I should say I would no wayes reflect on the Articles at Oxford? which being made (as I said) stands with the honour and justice of the Parliament to have them kept; was this to preach against the Articles?
2. Mr Dell in his Epistle also chargeth me that I called the Parliament a mongrel Parliament, which I did not; Indeed I said because errors and heresies spread, and the promoters thereof are not punished therefore others accuse them to be so, but I never did.
2. Mr Dell in his Epistle also chargeth me that I called the Parliament a mongrill Parliament, which I did not; Indeed I said because errours and heresies spread, and the promoters thereof are not punisht therefore others accuse them to be so, but I never did.