A brief declaration and vindication of the doctrine of the Trinity as also of…

And both these, namely satisfaction and pardon, with their order and consistency, were ⟨p. 220⟩solemnly represented by the great Institution of the Sacrifice of the Scape Goat. For after all the sins of the people were put upon him, or the punishment of them transferred unto him in a Type and Representation with quod in ejus caput-sit, the Formal Reason of all Sacrifices propitiatory, he was sent away with them, denoting the oblation or forgiveness of sin, after a Translation made of its punishment, Lev. 16. 21, 22. And whereas it is not expressly said, that that Goat suffered, or was slain, but was either [Greek or Hebrew] Hircus [Greek or Hebrew], a Goat sent away, or was sent to a Rock called Azazel in the Wilderness, as Vatablus and Oleaster, with some others think, (which is not probable, seeing though it might then be done whilst the people were in the Wilderness of Sinai; yet could not by reason of its distance, when the people were settled in Canaan be annually observed;) it was from the poverty of the Types, whereof no ⟨p. 221⟩one could fully represent that Grace which it had particular respect unto. What therefore was wanting in that Goat, was supplied in the other, which was slain as a sin offering, v. 11. 15.

And both these, namely satisfaction and pardon, with their order and consistency, were ⟨p. 220⟩solemnly represented by the great Institution of the Sacrifice of the Scape Goat. For after all the sins of the people were put upon him, or the punishment of them transferred unto him in a Type and Representation with quod in ejus caput-sit, the Formal Reason of all Sacrifices propitiatory, he was sent away with them, denoting the oblation or forgiveness of sin, after a Translation made of its punishment, Lev. 16. 21, 22. And whereas it is not expresly said, that that Goat suffered, or was slain, but was either 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 Hircus 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, a Goat sent away, or was sent to a Rock called Azazel in the Wilderness, as Vatablus and Oleaster, with some others think, (which is not probable, seeing though it might then be done whilest the people were in the Wilderness of Sinai; yet could not by reason of its distance, when the people were setled in Canaan be annually observed;) it was from the poverty of the Types, whereof no