It is known that the Primitive Church according to its Duty, was carefully watchful about the Holiness and upright walking of all that were admitted into the Society and Fellowship of it. Hence upon every known and visible failing, they required an open Repentance from the Offenders, before they would admit them into a participation of the sacred mysteries. But upon flagitious and scandalous crimes, such as Murder, Adultery, or Idolatry, in many Churches they would never admit those who had been guilty of them into their Communion any more. Their greatest and most signal trial, was with respect unto them, who through fear of death complied with the Gentiles in their Idolatrous Worship, in the time of Persecution. For they had fixed no certain general Rules whereby they should unanimously proceed, but every Church exercised severity or lenity, according as they saw cause, upon the circumstances of particular instances. Hence Cyprian in his banishment would not positively determine concerning those of the Church in Carthage, who had so sinned and fallen, but deferred his thoughts until his return; when he resolved to advise with the whole Church, and settle all things according to the counsel that should be agreed on amongst them. Yea many of his Epistles are on this subject peculiarly; and in them all, if compared together, it is evident, that there was no Rule agreed upon herein, nor was he himself resolved in his own mind, though strictly on all occasions opposing Novatianus, wherein it had been well if his Arguments had answered his Zeal. Before this the Church of Rome was esteemed in particular more remiss in their Discipline, and more than other Churches in their re-admission unto Communion, of notorious Offenders. Hence Tertullian in his Book de Poenitentia, reflects on Zepherinus the Bishop of Rome, that he had admitted Adulterers unto Repentance, and thereby unto the Communion of the Church. But that Church proceeding in her Lenity, and every day enlarging her Charity, Novatus and Novatianus taking offence thereat, advanced an Opinion on the contrary extreme.
It is known that the Primitive Church according to its Duty, was carefully watchful about the Holiness and upright walking of all that were admitted into the Society and Fellowship of it. Hence upon every known and visible failing, they required an open Repentance from the Offenders, before they would admit them into a participation of the sacred mysteries. But upon flagitious and scandalous crimes, such as Murder, Adultery, or Idolatry, in many Churches they would never admit those who had been guilty of them into their Communion any more. Their greatest and most signal trial, was with respect unto them, who through fear of death complied with the Gentiles in their Idolatrous Worship, in the time of Persecution. For they had fixed no certain general Rules whereby they should unanimously proceed, but every Church exercised severity or lenity, according as they saw cause, upon the circumstances of particular instances. Hence Cyprian in his banishment would not positively determine concerning those of the Church in Carthage, who had so sinned and fallen, but deferr'd his thoughts until his return; when he resolved to advise with the whole Church, and settle all things according to the counsel that should be agreed on amongst them. Yea many of his Epistles are on this subject peculiarly; and in them all, if compared together, it is evident, that there was no Rule agreed upon herein, nor was he himself resolved in his own mind, though strictly on all occasions opposing Novatianus, wherein it had been well if his Arguments had answered his Zeal. Before this the Church of Rome was esteemed in particular more remiss in their Discipline, and more than other Churches in their re-admission unto Communion, of notorious Offenders. Hence Tertullian in his Book de Poenitentia, reflects on Zepherinus the Bishop of Rome, that he had admitted Adulterers unto Repentance, and thereby unto the Communion of the Church. But that Church proceeding in her Lenity, and every day enlarging her Charity, Novatus and Novatianus taking offence thereat, advanced an Opinion on the contrary extream.
