A53678:243
A continuation of the exposition of the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the…
A continuation of the exposition of the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews viz, on the sixth, seventh, eight, ninth, and tenth chapters : wherein together with the explication of the text and context, the priesthood of Christ ... are declared, explained and confirmed : as also, the pleas of the Jews for the continuance and perpetuity of their legal worship, with the doctrine of the principal writers of the Socinians about these things, are examined and disproved / by J. Owen ...
London: printed for Nathaniel Ponder, 1680
Exegesis of chapter 6 › Exegesis of verses 4, 5, 6: Verse 4, 5, 6.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This was their work and labour of Love towards the name of God, ver. 10. And hereby also doth he difference them from those in the Text, concerning whom he supposeth that they may perish eternally; which these fruits of saving Faith and sincere Love cannot do. (3) He adds, that in the Preservation of those there mentioned, the Faithfulness of God was concerned; God is not unrighteous to forget. For they were such (he intended) as were interested in the Covenant of Grace, with respect whereunto alone, there is any engagement on the Faithfulness or Righteousness of God, to preserve men from Apostasy and Ruin; and there is so with an equal respect unto all who are so taken into the Covenant. But of these in the Text, he supposeth no such thing, and thereupon doth not intimate that either the Righteousness or Faithfulness of God were any way engaged for their preservation, but rather the contrary. The whole description therefore refers unto some especial Gospel Privileges, which Professors in those days were promiscuously made partakers of, and what they were in particular we must in the next place enquire.
This was their work and labour of Love towards the name of God, ver. 10. And hereby also doth he difference them from those in the Text, concerning whom he supposeth that they may perish eternally; which these fruits of saving Faith and sincere Love cannot do. (3) He adds, that in the Preservation of those there mentioned, the Faithfulness of God was concerned; God is not unrighteous to forget. For they were such (he intended) as were interested in the Covenant of Grace, with respect whereunto alone, there is any engagement on the Faithfulness or Righteousness of God, to preserve men from Apostasie and Ruine; and there is so with an equal respect unto all who are so taken into the Covenant. But of these in the Text, he supposeth no such thing, and thereupon doth not intimate that either the Righteousness or Faithfulness of God were any way engaged for their preservation, but rather the contrary. The whole description therefore refers unto some especial Gospel Priviledges, which Professors in those days were promiscuously made partakers of, and what they were in particular we must in the next place enquire.