Filter authors and titles

A53686:20

The Doctrine of Justification by Faith

Name: The Doctrine of Justification by Faith
Author: John Owen

The doctrine of justification by faith through the imputation of the righteousness of Christ, explained, confirmed, & vindicated by John Owen ...

John Owen 1616–1683London: printed for R. Boulter, 1677

[28], 560 [i.e. 590] p. · 208k words · Wing O739 · ESTC R13355

Title page: Princeton Theological Seminary Library copy, digitized by the Internet Archive (opens the Internet Archive in a new tab)

Contents: Considerations previous unto the Explanation of the Doctrine of Justification.

Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.

[ Earlier:17–32 of 1,120

:17img 7

[ Earlier passages Later passages ]

Position

Cited: :20
On this page: :17–32
Section: :13–27
Whole work: 1,120 passages

Cite

John Owen, The Doctrine of Justification by Faith (London, 1677), contents, unnumbered page (image 9). EEBO-TCP A53686.

Or select words in any passage to make an image of them.

The book

Title as printed: The doctrine of justification by faith through the imputation of the righteousness of Christ, explained, confirmed, & vindicated by John Owen ...
Author: John Owen 1616–1683
Place: London
Bookseller: R. Boulter
Year: 1677
Size: [28], 560 [i.e. 590] p.
Words: 207,656
Catalogue: Wing O739 · ESTC R13355
Text: EEBO-TCP A53686

Passages: 1,120
Sections: 32

Title page

The author

John Owen 1616–1683

PuritansEngland

Congregationalist theologian; Dean of Christ Church and Vice-Chancellor of Oxford.

Transcription key

•: an illegible letter
〈…〉: illegible words

The description given, explained, and confirmed. (1.) From the nature of the Gospel. (2.) Exemplified in its contrary, or the nature of unbelief. Prov. 1.30. Heb. 2.3. 1 Pet. 2.7. 1 Cor. 1.23, 24. 2 Cor. 4.3, 4. What it is, and wherein it doth consist. (3.) The Design of God, in, and by the Gospel. His own Glory, his utmost End in all things. The Glory of his Righteousness, Grace, Love, Wisdom, &c. The end of God in the Way of the Salvation of Sinners by Christ. Rom. 3.25. Joh. 3.16. 1 Joh. 3.16. Eph. 1.5, 6. 1 Cor. 1.24. Ephes. 3.10. Rom. 1.16.4.16. Ephes. 3.9. 2 Cor. 4.6. The nature of Faith thence declared. Faith alone ascribes and gives this glory to God. Order of the Acts of Faith, or the method in believing. Convictions previous thereunto. Sincere assent unto all Divine Revelations, Acts 26.27. The Proposal of the Gospel unto that end, Rom. 10.11, 12, 13, &c. 2 Cor. 3.18. State of Persons called to believe. Justifying Faith doth not consist in any one single habit or act of the Mind or Will. The nature of that assent which is the first Act of Faith. Approbation of the Way of Salvation by Christ, comprehensive of the special nature of justifying Faith. What is included therein. (1.) A Renuntiation of all other ways. Hos. 14.2, 3. Jer. 3.23. Psal. 7.16. Rom. 10.3. (2.) Consent of the Will unto this Way, Joh. 14.6. (3.) Acquiescency of the Heart in God. 1 Pet. 1.21. Trust in God. Faith described by Trust, the Reason of it. Nature and Object of this Trust inquired into. A double consideration of special Mercy. Whether Obedience be included in the nature of Faith, or be of the essence of it. A sincere purpose of Ʋniversal Obedience inseparable from Faith. How Faith alone justifieth. Repentance, how required in, and ⟨image 8⟩unto Justification. How a condition of the New Covenant. Perseverance in Obedience, is so also. Definitions of Faith. Pag. 125. CHAP. III. Ʋse of Faith in Justification; various Conceptions about it. By whom asserted, as the Instrument of it, by whom denied. In what sense it is affirmed so to be. The expressions of the Scripture, concerning the use of Faith in Justification, what they are; and how they are best explained. By an Instrumental Cause. Faith, how the Instrument of God in Justification. How the Instrument of them that do believe. The use of Faith expressed in the Scripture, by apprehending, receiving; declared by an Instrument.

:18img 8

Faith in what sense the condition of our Justification. Signification of that Term whence to be Learned. Pag. 146. CHAP. IV. The proper sense of these words, Justification and to justify, considered. Necessity thereof. Latin derivation of Justification. Some of the Ancients deceived by it. From Jus, and Justum; Justus filius, who. The Hebrew [Greek or Hebrew]. Use and signification of it. Places where it is used, examined. 2 Sam. 15.4. Deut. 21.5. Prov. 17.15. Isa. 5.23. Chap. 50.8. 1 King. 8.31, 32. 2 Chro. 6.22, 23. Psal. 82.3. Exod. 23.7. Isa. 53.11. Jere. 44.16. Dan. 12.3. The constant sense of the word, evinced. [Greek or Hebrew]. Use of it in other Authors, to punish. What it is in the New Testament, Matth. 11.19. Chap. 12.37. Luk. 7.29. Chap. 10.29. Chap. 16.15. Chap. 18.14. Acts 13.38, 39. Rom. 2.13. Chap. 3.4. Constantly used in a forensic sense. Places seeming dubious, vindicated. Rom. 8.30. 1 Cor. 6.11. Tit. 3.5, 6, 7. Revel. 22.11. How often these words [Greek or Hebrew] and [Greek or Hebrew], are used in the New Testament. ⟨image 8⟩Constant sense of this. The same evinced, from what is opposed unto it, Isa. 50.8. Prov. 17.15. Rom. 5.16, 18. Rom. 8.33, 34. And the Declaration of it in Terms equivalent. Rom. 4.6, 7. Rom. 5.9, 10. 2 Cor. 5.20, 21. Matth. 1.21. Acts 13.39. Gal. 2.16, &c. Justification in the Scripture, proposed under a Juridical Scheme, and of a forensic Title. The Parts and Progress of it. Instances from the whole. Pag. 169. &c. CHAP. V. Distinction of a First and Second Justification. The whole Doctrine of the Roman Church concerning Justification grounded on this Distinction. The First Justification, the nature and causes of it according unto the Romanists. The Second Justification, what it is in their sense. Solution of the seeming Difference between Paul and James, falsely pretended by this Distinction. The same Distinction received by the Socinians, and others. The latter termed by some, the continuation of our Justification. The Distinction disproved. Justification considered, either as unto its Essence, or its Manifestation. The Manifestation of it twofold, initial and final. Initial is either unto our selves, or others. No Second Justification hence ensues. Justification before God, Legal and Evangelical. Their distinct natures. The Distinction mentioned, derogatory to the Merit of Christ.

:19img 8

More in it ascribed unto our selves, then unto the Blood of Christ, in our Justification. The vanity of Disputations to this purpose. All true Justification, overthrown by this Distinction. No countenance given unto this Justification in the Scripture. The Second Justification not intended by the Apostle James. Evil of Arbitrary Distinctions. Our First Justification so described in the Scripture, as to leave no room for a Second. Of the Continuation of our Justification: Whether it depend on Faith alone, or our Personal Righteousness inquired. Justification at once completed in all Causes and Effects of it, ⟨image 9⟩proved at large. Believers upon their Justification, obliged unto perfect Obedience. The commanding Power of the Law constitutes the nature of Sin in them, who are not obnoxious unto its curse. Future Sins, in what sense remitted at our First Justification. The Continuation of Actual Pardon, and thereby of a justified Estate, on what it doth depend. Continuation of Justification, the act of God; whereon it depends in that sense. On our part it depends on Faith alone. Nothing required hereunto, but the Application of Righteousness imputed. The Continuation of our Justification is before God. That whereon the Continuation of our Justification depends, pleadable before God. This not our Personal Obedience proved. (1.) By the experience of all Believers. (2.) Testimonies of Scripture. (3.) Examples. The Distinction mentioned rejected. Pag. 189. CHAP. VI. Evangelical Personal Righteousness, the nature and use of it. Whether there be an Evangelical Justification on our Evangelical Righteousness inquired into. How this is by some affirmed and applauded. Evangelical Personal Righteousness asserted as the condition of our Legal Righteousness, or the Pardon of Sin. Opinion of the Socinians. Personal Righteousness required in the Gospel. Believers hence denominated Righteous. Not with respect unto Righteousness habitual, but actual only. Inherent Righteousness the same with Sanctification or Holiness. In what sense we may be said to be justified by Inherent Righteousness. No Evangelical Justification on our Personal Righteousness. The Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ doth not depend thereon. None have this Righteousness, but they are untecedently justified. A charge before God, in all Justification before God. The Instrument of this charge;

More in it ascribed unto our selves, then unto the Blood of Christ, in our Justification. The vanity of Disputations to this purpose. All true Justification, everthrown by this Distinction. No countenance given unto this Justification in the Scripture. The Second Justification not intended by the Apostle James. Evil of Arbitrary Distinctions. Our First Justification so described in the Scripture, as to leave no room for a Second. Of the Continuation of our Justification: Whether it depend on Faith alone, or our Personal Righteousness inquired. Justification at once compleated in all Causes and Effects of it, ⟨image 9⟩proved at large. Believers upon their Justification, obliged unto perfect Obedience. The commanding Power of the Law constitutes the nature of Sin in them, who are not obnoxious unto its curse. Future Sins, in what sense remitted at our First Justification. The Continuation of Actual Pardon, and thereby of a justified Estate, on what it doth depend. Continuation of Justification, the act of God; whereon it depends in that sense. On our part it depends on Faith alone. Nothing required hereunto, but the Application of Righteousness imputed. The Continuation of our Justification is before God. That whereon the Continuation of our Justification depends, pleadable before God. This not our Personal Obedience proved. (1.) By the experience of all Believers. (2.) Testimonies of Scripture. (3.) Examples. The Distinction mentioned rejected. Pag. 189. CHAP. VI. Evangelical Personal Righteousness, the nature and use of it. Whether there be an Evangelical Justification on our Evangelical Righteousness inquired into. How this is by some affirmed and applauded. Evangelical Personal Righteousness asserted as the condition of our Legal Righteousness, or the Pardon of Sin. Opinion of the Socinians. Personal Righteousness required in the Gospel. Believers hence denominated Righteous. Not with respect unto Righteousness habitual, but actual only. Inherent Righteousness the same with Sanctification or Holiness. In what sense we may be said to be justified by Inherent Righteousness. No Evangelical Justification on our Personal Righteousness. The Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ doth not depend thereon. None have this Righteousness, but they are untecedently justified. A charge before God, in all Justification before God. The Instrument of this charge;

:20img 9

the Law or the Gospel. From neither of them can we be justified by this Personal Righteousness. The Justification pretended needless and useless. It hath ⟨image 9⟩not the nature of any Justification mentioned in the Scripture; but is contrary to all that is so called. Other Arguments to the same purpose. Sentential Justification at the last day. Nature of the last Judgment. Who shall be then justified. A Declaration of Righteousness, and an Actual Admission unto Glory, the whole of Justification at the last day. The Argument that we are justified in this life, in the same manner, and on the same Grounds as we shall be judged at the last day, that Judgment being according unto Works, answered; and the Impertinency of it declared. Pag. 211. CHAP. VII. Imputation, and the nature of it. The first express Record of Justification, determineth it to be by Imputation. Gen. 15.6. Reasons of it. The Doctrine of Imputation cleared by Paul; the occasion of it. Maligned and opposed by many. Weight of the Doctrine concerning Imputation of Righteousness on all hands acknowledged. Judgment of the Reformed Churches herein, particularly of the Church of England. By whom opposed, and on what Grounds. Signification of the Word. Difference between reputare and imputare. Imputation of two kinds. (1.) Of what was ours antecedently unto that Imputation, whether good or evil. Instances in both kinds. Nature of this Imputation. The thing imputed by it, imputed for what it is, and nothing else. (2.) Of what is not ours antecedently unto that Imputation, but is made so by it. General nature of this Imputation. Not judging of others to have done what they have not done. Several distinct Grounds and Reasons of this Imputation. (1.) Ex Justitia; (1.) Propter Relationem foederalem. (2.) Propter Relationem Naturalem. (2.) Ex voluntaria sponsione. Instances, Philem. 17. Gen. 43.9▪ Voluntary sponsion, the Ground of the Imputation of Sin to Christ. (3.) Ex injuria. 1 King. 1.21. (4.) Ex mera Gratia. ⟨image 10⟩Rom. 4. Difference between the Imputation of any Works of ours, and of the Righteousness of God. Imputation of Inherent Righteousness, is Ex Justitia. Inconsistency of it, with that which is Ex mera Gratia. Rom. 11.6. Agreement of both kinds of Imputation. The true nature of the Imputation of Righteousness unto Justification, explained. Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ.

:21img 10

The thing it self imputed, not the effect of it; proved against the Socinians. Pag. 226. CHAP. VIII. Imputation of Sin unto Christ. Testimonies of the Ancients unto that purpose. Christ and the Church, one Mystical Person. Mistakes about that State and Relation. Grounds and Reasons of the Union, that is the foundation of this Imputation. Christ the Surety of the New Covenant; in what sense, unto what ends. Heb. 7.22. opened. Mistakes about the Causes, and Ends of the Death of Christ. The New Covenant in what sense alone procured and purchased thereby. Inquiry whether the Guilt of our sins, was imputed unto Christ. The meaning of the words, Guilt and Guilty. The Distinction of Reatus culpae and Reatus paenae, examined. Act of God in the Imputation of the Guilt of our Sins unto Christ. Objections against it, answered. The Truth confirmed. Pag. 246. CHAP. IX. Principal Controversies about Justification. (1.) Concerning the nature of Justification, stated. (2.) Of the Formal Cause of it. (3.) Of the Way whereby we are made partakers of the Benefits of the Mediation of Christ. What intended by the Formal Cause of Justification, declared. The Righteousness on the account whereof Believers are justified before God alone, inquired after under those Terms. This the Righteousness of ⟨image 10⟩Christ, imputed unto them. Occasions of Exceptions and Objections against this Doctrine General Objections examined. Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ; consistent with the Free Pardon of Sin, with the necessity of Evangelical Repentance. Method of Gods Grace in our Justification. Necessity of Faith unto Justification, on supposition of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Grounds of that Necessity. Other Objections arising mostly from mistakes of the Truth, asserted, discussed and answered. Pag. 289. CHAP. X. Arguments for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Our own Personal Righteousness, not that on the account whereof we are justified in the sight of God. Disclaimed in the Scripture, as to any such end. The truth and reality of it granted. Manifold Imperfections accompanying it, rendering it unmeet to be a Righteousness unto the Justification of Life. Pag. 315. CHAP. XI. Nature of the Obedience or Righteousness required unto Justification. Original and Causes of the Law of Creation. The Substance and End of that Law.

The thing it self imputed, not the effect of it; proved against the Socinians. Pag. 226. CHAP. VIII. Imputation of Sin unto Christ. Testimonies of the Antients unto that purpose. Christ and the Church, one Mystical Person. Mistakes about that State and Relation. Grounds and Reasons of the Ʋnion, that is the foundation of this Imputation. Christ the Surety of the New Covenant; in what sense, unto what ends. Heb. 7.22. opened. Mistakes about the Causes, and Ends of the Death of Christ. The New Covenant in what sense alone procured and purchased thereby. Inquiry whether the Guilt of our sins, was imputed unto Christ. The meaning of the words, Guilt and Guilty. The Distinction of Reatus culpae and Reatus paenae, examined. Act of God in the Imputation of the Guilt of our Sins unto Christ. Objections against it, answered. The Truth confirmed. Pag. 246. CHAP. IX. Principal Controversies about Justification. (1.) Concerning the nature of Justification, stated. (2.) Of the Formal Cause of it. (3.) Of the Way whereby we are made partakers of the Benefits of the Mediation of Christ. What intended by the Formal Cause of Justification, declared. The Righteousness on the account whereof Believers are justified before God alone, inquired after under those Terms. This the Righteousness of ⟨image 10⟩Christ, imputed unto them. Occasions of Exceptions and Objections against this Doctrine General Objections examined. Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ; consistent with the Free Pardon of Sin, with the necessity of Evangelical Repentance. Method of Gods Grace in our Justification. Necessity of Faith unto Justification, on supposition of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Grounds of that Necessity. Other Objections arising mostly from mistakes of the Truth, asserted, discussed and answered. Pag. 289. CHAP. X. Arguments for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Our own Personal Righteousness, not that on the account whereof we are justified in the sight of God. Disclaimed in the Scripture, as to any such end. The truth and reality of it granted. Manifold Imperfections accompanying it, rendering it unmeet to be a Righteousness unto the Justification of Life. Pag. 315. CHAP. XI. Nature of the Obedience or Righteousness required unto Justification. Original and Causes of the Law of Creation. The Substance and End of that Law.

:22img 10

The Immutability or unchangeableness of it, considered absolutely; and as it was the Instrument of the Covenant between God and Man. Arguments to prove it unchangeable; and its Obligation unto the Righteousness first required, perpetually in force. Therefore not abrogated, not dispensed withal, not derogated from, but accomplished. This alone by Christ, and the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us. Pag. 340. ⟨image 11⟩CHAP. XII. Imputation of the Obedience of Christ, no less necessary then that of his suffering on the same Ground. Objections against it. 1. That it is impossible. Management hereof by Socinus. Ground of this Objection, That the Lord Christ was for himself obliged unto all the Obedience he yielded unto God, and performed it for himself, answered. The Obedience inquired after, the Obedience of the Person of Christ the Son of God. In his whole Person, Christ was not under the Law. He designed the Obedience he performed, for us not for himself. This Actual Obedience not necessary as a qualification of his Person, unto the discharge of his Office. The Foundation of this Obedience in his being made Man, and of the Posterity of Abraham, not for himself, but for us. Right of the Humane Nature unto Glory, by virtue of Union. Obedience necessary unto the Humane Nature, as Christ in it was made under the Law. This Obedience properly for us. Instances of that nature among Men. Christ obeyed as a public Person; and so not for himself. Humane Nature of Christ subject unto the Law, as an Eternal Rule of dependence on God, and subjection to him; not as prescribed unto us whilst we are in this World, in order unto our future Blessedness, or Reward. Second Objection, that it is useless, answered. He that is pardoned all his sins, is not thereon esteemed to have done all that is required of him. Not to be unrighteous, Negatively; not the same with being righteous, Positively. The Law obligeth both unto punishment and obedience; how, and in what sense. Pardon of Sin gives no title to Eternal Life. The Righteousness of Christ who is one, imputed unto many. Arguments proving the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ, unto the Justification of Life. Pag. 361. ⟨image 11⟩CHAP. XIII. The Difference between the two Covenants, stated. Arguments from thence. Pag. 396. CHAP. XIV. All Works whatever expressly excluded from any interest in our Justification before God.

The Immutability or unchangeableness of it, considered absolutely; and as it was the Instrument of the Covenant between God and Man. Arguments to prove it unchangeable; and its Obligation unto the Righteousness first required, perpetually in force. Therefore not abrogated, not dispensed withal, not derogated from, but accomplished. This alone by Christ, and the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us. Pag. 340. ⟨image 11⟩CHAP. XII. Imputation of the Obedience of Christ, no less necessary then that of his suffering on the same Ground. Objections against it. 1. That it is impossible. Management hereof by Socinus. Ground of this Objection, That the Lord Christ was for himself obliged unto all the Obedience he yielded unto God, and performed it for himself, answered. The Obedience inquired after, the Obedience of the Person of Christ the Son of God. In his whole Person, Christ was not under the Law. He designed the Obedience he performed, for us not for himself. This Actual Obedience not necessary as a qualification of his Person, unto the discharge of his Office. The Foundation of this Obedience in his being made Man, and of the Posterity of Abraham, not for himself, but for us. Right of the Humane Nature unto Glory, by virtue of Ʋnion. Obedience necessary unto the Humane Nature, as Christ in it was made under the Law. This Obediencs properly for us. Instances of that nature among Men. Christ obeyed as a publick Person; and so not for himself. Humane Nature of Christ subject unto the Law, as an Eternal Rule of dependance on God, and subjection to him; not as prescribed unto us whilest we are in this World, in order unto our future Blessedness, or Reward. Second Objection, that it is useless, answered. He that is pardoned all his sins, is not thereon esteemed to have done all that is required of him. Not to be unrighteous, Negatively; not the same with being righteous, Positively. The Law obligeth both unto punishment and obedience; how, and in what sense. Pardon of Sin gives no title to Eternal Life. The Righteousness of Christ who is one, imputed unto many. Arguments proving the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ, unto the Justification of Life. Pag. 361. ⟨image 11⟩CHAP. XIII. The Difference between the two Covenants, stated. Arguments from thence. Pag. 396. CHAP. XIV. All Works whatever expresly excluded from any interst in our Justification before God.

:23img 11

What intended by the Works of the Law. Not those of the Ceremonial Law only. Not perfect Works only, as required by the Law of our Creation. Not the outward Works of the Law performed without a principle of Faith. Not Works of the Jewish Law. Not Works with a conceit of Merit. Not Works only wrought before believing in the strength of our own wills. Works excluded absolutely from our Justification without respect unto a Distinction of a First and Second Justification. The true sense of the Law in the Apostolical Assertion, that none are justified by the Works thereof. What the Jews understood by the Law. Distribution of the Law under the Old Testament. The whole Law a perfect Rule of all Inherent Moral or Spiritual Obedience. What are the Works of the Law, declared from the Scripture, and the Argument thereby confirmed. The nature of Justifying Faith further declared. Pag. 400. CHAP. XV. Of Faith alone. CHAP. XVI. Testimonies of Scripture confirming the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Jere. 23.6. Explained and vindicated. Pag. 419. CHAP. XVII. Testimonies out of the Evangelists, considered. Design of our Saviours Sermon on the Mount. The purity and penalty of the ⟨image 12⟩Law, vindicated by him. Arguments from thence. Luk. 18.9, 10, 11, 12, 13. The Parable of the Pharisee and Publican explained and applied to the present Argument. Testimonies out of the Gospel by John, Chap. 3.14, 15, 16, 17, 18, &c. Pag. 425. CHAP. XVIII. Testimonies out of the Epistles of Paul, the Apostle. His design in the Fifth Chapter to the Romans. That Design explained at large and applied to the present Argument. Chap. 3.24, 25, 26. explained, and the true sense of the words vindicated. The Causes of Justification enumerated. Apostolical Inferences from the consideration of them. Chap. 4. Design of the Disputation of the Apostle therein. Analysis of his Discourse. Ver. 4, 5. particularly insisted on, their true sense vindicated. What Works excluded from the Justification of Abraham. Who it is, that worketh not. In what sense the ungodly are justified. All Men ungodly antecedently unto their Justification. Faith alone the means of Justification on our part. Faith it self absolutely considered, not the Righteousness that is imputed unto us. Proved by sundry Arguments. Pag. 431. Chap. 5. Ver. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18.

What intended by the Works of the Law. Not those of the Ceremonial Law only. Not perfect Works only, as required by the Law of our Creation. Not the outward Works of the Law performed without a principle of Faith. Not Works of the Jewish Law. Not Works with a conceit of Merit. Not Works only wrought before believing in the strength of our own wills. Works excluded absolutely from our Justification without respect unto a Distinction of a First and Second Justification. The true sense of the Law in the Apostolical Assertion, that none are justified by the Works thereof. What the Jews understood by the Law. Distribution of the Law under the Old Testament. The whole Law a perfect Rule of all Inherent Moral or Spiritual Obedience. What are the Works of the Law, declared from the Scripture, and the Argument thereby confirmed. The nature of Justifying Faith further declared. Pag. 400. CHAP. XV. Of Faith alone. CHAP. XVI. Testimonies of Scripture confirming the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Rightesness of Christ. Jere. 23.6. Explained and vindicated. Pag. 419. CHAP. XVII. Testimonies out of the Evangelists, considered. Design of our Saviours Sermon on the Mount. The purity and penalty of the ⟨image 12⟩Law, vindicated by him. Arguments from thence. Luk. 18.9, 10, 11, 12, 13. The Parable of the Pharisee and Publican explained and applied to the present Argument. Testimonies out of the Gospel by John, Chap. 3.14, 15, 16, 17, 18, &c. Pag. 425. CHAP. XVIII. Testimonies out of the Epistles of Paul, the Apostle. His design in the Fifth Chapter to the Romans. That Design explained at large and applied to the present Argument. Chap. 3.24, 25, 26. explained, and the true sense of the words vindicated. The Causes of Justification enumerated. Apostolical Inferences from the consideration of them. Chap. 4. Design of the Disputation of the Apostle therein. Analysis of his Discourse. Ver. 4, 5. particularly insisted on, their true sense vindicated. What Works excluded from the Justification of Abraham. Who it is, that worketh not. In what sense the ungodly are justified. All Men ungodly antecedently unto their Justification. Faith alone the means of Justification on our part. Faith it self absolutely considered, not the Righteousness that is imputed unto us. Proved by sundry Arguments. Pag. 431. Chap. 5. Ver. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18.

:24img 12

Boasting excluded in our selves, asserted in God. The design and sum of the Apostles Argument. Objection of Socinus removed. Comparison between the two Adams, and those that derive from them. Sin entered into the World. What Sin intended. Death, what it compriseth. What intended by it. The sense of those words in as much, or in whom all have sinned, cleared and vindicated. The various oppositions used by the Apostle in this Discourse. Principally between Sin or the Fall, and the Free Gift. Between the disobedience of the one, and the obedience of another. Judgment on the one hand, and Justification ⟨image 12⟩unto Life on the other. The whole Context at large, explained, and the Argument for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ, fully confirmed. P. 464. Chap. 10. V. 3, 4. explained, and insisted on to the same purpose. Pag. 489. 1 Cor. 1.30. Christ, how of God made Righteousness unto us. Answer of Bellarmine unto this Testimony, removed. That of Socinus, disproved. True sense of the words evinced. P. 497. 2 Cor. 5.21. In what sense Christ knew no sin. Emphasis in that expression. How he was made Sin for us. By the Imputation of Sin unto him. Mistakes of some about this expression. Sense of the Ancients. Exception of Bellarmine unto this Testimony, answered; with other Reasonings of his to the same purpose. P. 502. The Exceptions of others also removed. Gal. 2.16. Pag. 513. Ephes. 2.8, 9, 10. Ephes. 2.8, 9, 10. Evidence of this Testimony. Design of the Apostle from the beginning of the Chapter. Method of the Apostle in the Declaration of the Grace of God. Grace alone the cause of Deliverance from a State of Sin. Things to be observed in the Assignation of the Causes of Spiritual Deliverance. Grace, how magnified by him. Force of the Argument, and evidence from thence. State of the Case here proposed by the Apostle. General determination of it. By Grace ye are saved. What it is to be saved, inquired into. The same as to be justified, but not exclusively. The causes of our Justification, declared Positively and Negatively. The whole secured unto the Grace of God by Christ, and our Interest therein through Faith alone. Works excluded. What Works? Not Works of the Law of Moses. Not Works antecedent unto believing. Works of true Believers. Not only in opposition to the Grace of God, but to Faith in us. Argument from those words.

Boasting excluded in our selves, asserted in God. The design and sum of the Apostles Argument. Objection of Socinus removed. Comparison between the two Adams, and those that derive from them. Sin entered into the World. What Sin intended. Death, what it compriseth. What intended by it. The sense of those words in as much, or in whom all have sinned, cleared and vindicated. The various oppositions used by the Apostle in this Discourse. Principally between Sin or the Fall, and the Free Gift. Between the disobedience of the one, and the obedience of another. Judgment on the one hand, and Justification ⟨image 12⟩unto Life on the other. The whole Context at large, explained, and the Argument for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ, fully confirmed. P. 464. Chap. 10. V. 3, 4. explained, and insisted on to the same purpose. Pag. 489. 1 Cor. 1.30. Christ, how of God made Righteousness unto us. Answer of Bellarmine unto this Testimony, removed. That of Socinus, disproved. True sense of the words evinced. P. 497. 2 Cor. 5.21. In what sense Christ knew no sin. Emphasis in that expression. How he was made Sin for us. By the Imputation of Sin unto him. Mistakes of some about this expression. Sense of the Antients. Exception of Bellarmine unto this Testimony, answered; with other Reasonings of his to the same purpose. P. 502. The Exceptions of others also removed. Gal. 2.16. Pag. 513. Ephes. 2.8, 9, 10. Ephes. 2.8, 9, 10. Evidence of this Testemony. Design of the Apostle from the beginning of the Chapter. Method of the Apostle in the Declaration of the Grace of God. Grace alone the cause of Deliverance from a State of Sin. Things to be observed in the Assignation of the Causes of Spiritual Deliverance. Grace, how magnified by him. Force of the Argument, and evidence from thence. State of the Case here proposed by the Apostle. General determination of it. By Grace ye are saved. What it is to be saved, inquired into. The same as to be justified, but not exclusively. The causes of our Justification, declared Positively and Negatively. The whole secured unto the Grace of God by Christ, and our Interest therein through Faith alone. Works excluded. What Works? Not Works of the Law of Moses. Not Works antecedent unto believing. Works of true Believers. Not only in opposition to the Grace of God, but to Faith in us. Argument from those words.

:25img 12

Reason whereon this exclusion of Works is founded. To exclude Boasting on our part. Boasting wherein it ⟨image 13⟩consists. Inseparable from the Interest of Works in Justification. Danger of it. Confirmation of this Reason obviating an Objection. The Objection stated. If we be not justified by Works, of what use are they, answered. Pag. 516. Phil. 3.8, 9. Heads of Argument from this Testimony. Design of the Context. Righteousness the Foundation of Acceptance with God. A twofold Righteousness considered by the Apostle. Opposite unto one another, as unto the especial end inquired after. Which of these he adhered unto, his own Righteousness or the Righteousness of God; declared by the Apostle with vehemency of speech. Reasons of his earnestness herein. The turning point whereon he left Judaism. The opposition made unto this Doctrine by the Jews. The weight of the Doctrine and unwillingness of Men to receive it. His own sense of Sin and Grace. Peculiar expressions used in this place, for the Reasons mentioned, concerning Christ. Concerning all things that are our own. The choice to be made on the Case stated, whether we will adhere unto our own Righteousness, or that of Christs, which are inconsistent as to the end of Justification. Argument from this place. Exceptions unto this Testimony, and Argument from thence, removed. Our Personal Righteousness Inherent, the same with respect unto the Law and Gospel. External Righteousness only required by the Law, an impious Imagination. Works▪ wrought before Faith only rejected. The Exception removed. Righteousness before Conversion, not intended by the Apostle. Pag. 256. CHAP. XIX. Objections against the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Nature of these Objections. Difficulty in discerning aright the sense of some Men in this Argument. Justification by Works, the end of all declension from ⟨image 13⟩the Righteousness of Christ. Objections against this Doctrine derived from a supposition thereof alone. First principal Objection; Imputed Righteousness overthrows the necessity of an holy Life. This Objection as managed by them of the Church of Rome, an open calumny. How insisted on by some among our selves. Socinus fierceness in this charge. His foul dishonesty therein. False charges on Mens opinions, making way for the rash condemnation of their persons. Iniquity of such censures.

Reason whereon this exclusion of Works is founded. To exclude Boasting on our part. Boasting wherein it ⟨image 13⟩consists. Inseparable from the Interest of Works in Justification. Danger of it. Confirmation of this Reason obviating an Objection. The Objection stated. If we be not justified by Works, of what use are they, answered. Pag. 516. Phil. 3.8, 9. Heads of Argument from this Testimony. Design of the Context. Righteousness the Foundation of Acceptance with God. A twofold Righteousness considered by the Apostle. Oppossite unto one another, as unto the especial end inquired after. Which of these he adhered unto, his own Righteousness or the Righteousness of God; declared by the Apostle with vehemency of speech. Reasons of his earnestness herein. The turning point whereon he left Judaism. The opposition made unto this Doctrine by the Jews. The weight of the Doctrine and unwillingness of Men to receive it. His own sense of Sin and Grace. Peculiar expressions used in this place, for the Reasons mentioned, concerning Christ. Concerning all things that are our own. The choice to be made on the Case stated, whether we will adhere unto our own Righteousness, or that of Christs, which are inconsistent as to the end of Justification. Argument from this place. Exceptions unto this Testimony, and Argument from thence, removed. Our Personal Righteousness Inherent, the same with respect unto the Law and Gospel. External Righteousness only required by the Law, an impious Imagination. Works▪ wrought before Faith only rejected. The Exception removed. Righteousness before Conversion, not intended by the Apostle. Pag. 256. CHAP. XIX. Objections against the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Nature of these Objections. Difficulty in discerning aright the sense of some Men in this Argument. Justification by Works, the end of all declension from ⟨image 13⟩the Righteousness of Christ. Objections against this Doctrine derived from a supposition thereof alone. First principal Objection; Imputed Righteousness overthrows the necessity of an holy Life. This Objection as managed by them of the Church of Rome, an open calumny. How insisted on by some among our selves. Socinus fierceness in this charge. His foul dishonesty therein. False charges on Mens opinions, making way for the rash condemnation of their persons. Iniquity of such censures.

:26img 13

The Objection rightly stated. Sufficiently answered in the previous Discourses about the nature of Faith, and force of Moral Law. The nature and necessity of Evangelical Holiness elsewhere pleaded. Particular answers unto this Objection. All who profess this Doctrine do not exemplify it in their lives. The most holy Truths have been abused. None by whom this Doctrine is now denied, exceed them in holiness, by whom it was formerly professed, and the power of it attested. The contrary Doctrine not successful in the Reformation of the lives of Men. The best way to determine this difference. The same Objection managed against the Doctrine of the Apostle in his own days. Efficacious prejudices against this Doctrine in the minds of Men. The whole Doctrine of the Apostle liable to be abused. Answers of the Apostle unto this Objection. He never once attempts to answer it, by declaring the necessity of Personal Righteousness, or good Works unto Justification before God. He confines the cogency of Evangelical Motives unto Obedience only unto Believers. Grounds of Evangelical Holiness asserted by him in compliance with his Doctrine of Justification. (1.) Divine Ordination. Exceptions unto this Ground, removed. (2.) Answer of the Apostle vindicated. The Obligation of the Law unto Obedience. Nature of it, and consistency with Grace. This Answer of the Apostle vindicated. Heads of other Principles that might be pleaded to the same purpose. Pag. 539. ⟨image 14⟩CHAP. XX. Seeming Difference, no real contradiction between the Apostles Paul and James, concerning Justification. This granted by all. Reasons of the seeming Difference. The best Rule of the Interpretation of places of Scripture, wherein there is an appearing repugnancy. The Doctrine of Justification according unto that Rule principally to be learned from the Writings of Paul. The Reasons of his fullness and accuracy in the teaching of that Doctrine. The Importance of the Truth; the opposition made unto it; and abuse of it. The design of the Apostle James. Exceptions of some against the Writings of S. Paul, scandalous and unreasonable. Not in this matter to be interpreted by the passage in James insisted on, Chap. 2. That there is no repugnancy between the Doctrine of the two Apostles demonstrated. Heads and Grounds of the Demonstration. Their scope, design, and end not the same. That of Paul;

The Objection rightly stated. Sufficiently answered in the previous Discourses about the nature of Faith, and force of Moral Law. The nature and necessity of Evangelical Holiness elswhere pleaded. Particular answers unto this Objection. All who profess this Doctrine do not exemplifie it in their lives. The most holy Truths have been abused. None by whom this Doctrine is now denied, exceed them in holiness, by whom it was formerly professed, and the power of it attested. The contrary Doctrine not successful in the Reformation of the lives of Men. The best way to determine this difference. The same Objection managed against the Doctrine of the Apostle in his own days. Efficacious prejudices against this Doctrine in the minds of Men. The whole Doctrine of the Apostle liable to be abused. Answers of the Apostle unto this Objection. He never once attempts to answer it, by declaring the necessity of Personal Righteousness, or good Works unto Justification before God. He confines the cogency of Evangelical Motives unto Obedience only unto Believers. Grounds of Evangelical Holiness asserted by him in compliance with his Doctrine of Justification. (1.) Divine Ordination. Exceptions unto this Ground, removed. (2.) Answer of the Apostle vindicated. The Obligation of the Law unto Obedience. Nature of it, and consistency with Grace. This Answer of the Apostle vindicated. Heads of other Principles that might be pleaded to the same purpose. Pag. 539. ⟨image 14⟩CHAP. XX. Seeming Difference, no real contradiction between the Apostles Paul and James, concerning Justification. This granted by all. Reasons of the seeming Difference. The best Rule of the Interpretation of places of Scripture, wherein there is an appearing repugnancy. The Doctrine of Justification according unto that Rule principally to be learned from the Writings of Paul. The Reasons of his fulness and accuracy in the teaching of that Doctrine. The Importance of the Truth; the opposition made unto it; and abuse of it. The design of the Apostle James. Exceptions of some against the Writings of S. Paul, scandalous and unreasonable. Not in this matter to be interpreted by the passage in James insisted on, Chap. 2. That there is no repugnancy between the Doctrine of the two Apostles demonstrated. Heads and Grounds of the Demonstration. Their scope, design, and end not the same. That of Paul;

:29img 15

Pag. 10. Line 2. a fine, read other, p. 11. l. 24. none, r. nothing, p. 41. l. 30. r▪ [Greek or Hebrew], l. 33. [Greek or Hebrew], p. 42. l. 22. r. [Greek or Hebrew], p. 53. l. 6. r. this Author, l. 25. man, r. men, l. 26. them, p. 64. l. 4. a fine, that it is, p. 71. l. 21. and r. add, p. 72. l. 12. r. For an, p. 172. l. 17. for [Greek or Hebrew] r. [Greek or Hebrew], l▪ 28. Hithpaol, p. 174. l. 8. [Greek or Hebrew], p. 175. l. 10. [Greek or Hebrew], l. 20. [Greek or Hebrew], l. 24. [Greek or Hebrew], l. 28. [Greek or Hebrew], p. 176. l. 3. [Greek or Hebrew], l. 8. [Greek or Hebrew], l. 9. [Greek or Hebrew], l. 4. a fine, [Greek or Hebrew], l. 3. a fine, affects, p. 180. l. 22. vocation that is intended, p. 199. l. 1. which was, r. whereas, p. 208.23. such, r. Faith, p. 234. l. 2. deal [Greek or Hebrew], p. 266. l. 8. Curcellaeus, p. 283. l. 23. suffered r. offered, p. 311. l. 30. of him, p. 362. l. 11. r. as if we, p. 392. l. 20. r. more colour, p. 412. l. 7. [Greek or Hebrew], p. 436. l. 2. a fine, r. other men, p. 444. l. 10. proofs, r. process, p. 465. l. 1. [Greek or Hebrew]

PAg. 10. Line 2. a fine, read other, p. 11. l. 24. none, r. nothing, p. 41. l. 30. r▪ 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l. 33. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, p. 42. l. 22. r. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, p. 53. l. 6. r. this Author, l. 25. man, r. men, l. 26. them, p. 64. l. 4. a fine, that it is, p. 71. l. 21. and r. add, p. 72. l. 12. r. For an, p. 172. l. 17. for 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 r. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l▪ 28. Hithpaol, p. 174. l. 8. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, p. 175. l. 10. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l. 20. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l. 24. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l. 28. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, p. 176. l. 3. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l. 8. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l. 9. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l. 4. a fine, 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, l. 3. a fine, affects, p. 180. l. 22. vocation that is intended, p. 199. l. 1. which was, r. whereas, p. 208.23. such, r. Faith, p. 234. l. 2. dele 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, p. 266. l. 8. Curcellaeus, p. 283. l. 23. suffered r. offered, p. 311. l. 30. of him, p. 362. l. 11. r. as if we, p. 392. l. 20. r. more colour, p. 412. l. 7. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, p. 436. l. 2. a fine, r. other men, p. 444. l. 10. proofs, r. process, p. 465. l. 1. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉

The Doctrine of Justification by Faith

Some of the Mistakes that have escaped in the Press may be thus corrected.

General Considerations previously necessary unto the Explanation of the Doctrine of Justification.

Reformers309

Puritans1,782

Westminster Assembly24

Evangelicals36

Some of the Mistakes that have escaped in the Press may be thus corrected.

General Considerations previously necessary unto the Explanation of the Doctrine of Justification.