A53686:908
The Doctrine of Justification by Faith
The doctrine of justification by faith through the imputation of the righteousness of Christ, explained, confirmed, & vindicated by John Owen ...
London: printed for R. Boulter, 1677
Chapter 18 › Chap. 5. Vers. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Socinus acknowledgeth that this place of Scripture doth give, as he speaks the greatest occasion unto our opinion in this matter: For he cannot deny, but, at least, a great appearance of what we believe, is represented in the words of the Apostle. He doth therefore use his utmost endeavour to wrest and deprave them: And yet, although most of his Artifices are since traduced into the Annotations of others upon the place, he himself produceth nothing material, but what is taken out of Origen, and the Comment of Pelagius on this Epistle, which is extant in the Works of Jerome, and was urged before him by Erasmus. The substance of what he pleads for is, That the actual transgression of Adam is not imputed unto his posterity, nor a depraved nature from thence communicated unto them. Only whereas he had incurred the penalty of death, all that derive their nature from him in that condition, are rendered subject unto death also. And as for that corruption of nature which is in us, or a proneness unto sin, it is not derived from Adam, but is an habit contracted by many continued acts of our own. So also on the other hand, that the Obedience or Righteousness of Christ, is not imputed unto us. Only when we make our ⟨p. 467⟩selves to become his Children by our obedience unto him; he having obtained eternal life for himself by his obedience unto God, we are made partakers of the benefits thereof. This is the substance of his long Disputation on this subject, De Servator. lib. 4. cap. 6. But this is not to expound the words of the Apostle, but expressly to contradict them, as we shall see in the ensuing consideration of them.
Socinus acknowledgeth that this place of Scripture doth give, as he speaks the greatest occasion unto our opinion in this matter: For he cannot deny, but, at least, a great appearance of what we believe, is represented in the words of the Apostle. He doth therefore use his utmost endeavor to wrest and deprave them: And yet, although most of his Artifices are since traduced into the Annotations of others upon the place, he himself produceth nothing material, but what is taken out of Origen, and the Comment of Pelagius on this Epistle, which is extant in the Works of Jerome, and was urged before him by Erasmus. The substance of what he pleads for is, That the actual transgression of Adam is not imputed unto his posterity, nor a depraved nature from thence communicated unto them. Only whereas he had incurred the penalty of death, all that derive their nature from him in that condition, are rendred subject unto death also. And as for that corruption of nature which is in us, or a proneness unto sin, it is not derived from Adam, but is an habit contracted by many continued acts of our own. So also on the other hand, that the Obedience or Righteousness of Christ, is not imputed unto us. Only when we make our