A53694:416
Exercitations concerning the name, original, nature, use, and continuance of a day of sacred…
Exercitations concerning the name, original, nature, use, and continuance of a day of sacred rest wherein the original of the Sabbath from the foundation of the world, the morality of the Fourth commandment with the change of the Seventh day are enquired into : together with an assertion of the divine institution of the Lord's Day, and practical directions for its due observation / by John Owen.
London: printed by R.W. for Nath. Ponder, 1671
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Others of these Jews about the same season constituted a sect by themselves, compounding a Religion out of the Law and Gospel, with additions and interpretations of their own. These the Ancients call Ebionites. Circumcision with all the Sabbaths, Feasts, and Rites of Moses, they retained from the Law. That the Messiah was come, and that Jesus Christ was he, they admitted from the Gospel; that he was only a mere man, not God and man in one person, they added of their own, yet in compliance with the sense and expectation of the corrupt and carnal part of the Church of the Jews, whereof originally they were. And this sect is that which in a long tract of time hath brought forth Mahumetanisme in the East. For the Religion of the Mahometans is nothing but that of the Ebionites, with a super-addition of the interests and fanatical brain-sick notions of the Impostor himself.
Others of these Jews about the same season constituted a sect by themselves, compounding a Religion out of the Law and Gospel, with additions and interpretations of their own. These the Ancients call Ebionites. Circumcision with all the Sabbaths, Feasts, and Rites of Moses, they retained from the Law. That the Messiah was come, and that Jesus Christ was he, they admitted from the Gospel; that he was only a meer man, not God and man in one person, they added of their own, yet in compliance with the sense and expectation of the corrupt and carnal part of the Church of the Jews, whereof originally they were. And this sect is that which in a long tract of time hath brought forth Mahumetanisme in the East. For the Religion of the Mahumetans is nothing but that of the Ebionites, with a super-addition of the interests and fanatical brain-sick notions of the Impostor himself.
And yet so it is that some begin now to plead, that these Ebionites were the only true and genuine Believers of the Circumcision in those days. These, ⟨p. 405⟩they say, and these alone, retained the Doctrine preached by the Apostles to the Jews, for they were the same and no other with those which were also called Nazarenes. Thus do the Socinians plead expressly, and have contended for it in sundry Treatises published to that purpose. This they do, hoping to obtain from thence some countenance unto their impious Doctrine about the person of Christ, wherein they agree with the Ebionites. But as to their Sabbatizing with the Jews, and the rest of their ceremonial observances, they will have nothing to do with them, as not finding those things suited unto their interest and design. But herein do they now begin to be followed by some among our selves, who apparently fall in with them in sundry things condemned by our Apostle, and on the account whereof they declined him, and rejected his Authority, as others seem almost prepared to do, on other Reasons not here to be mentioned. In particular some begin to Sabbatize with them, yea to outgo them. For Ebion and his followers, although they observed the seventh Day Sabbath with the Jews, yet they observed also the Lords Day with the Christians, in honour of Jesus Christ, as both Eusebius and Epiphanius testify: [Greek or Hebrew]. They in like manner with us observe the Lords Day, in remembrance of the saving Resurrection. How great a scandal these things are to Christian Religion, how evidently tending to harden the Jews in their infidelity is apparent unto all. For the introduction of any part of the old Mosaical system of Ordinances, is a tacit denial of Christs being come in the flesh, at least of his being the King, Lord, and Lawgiver