A53696:640
Exercitations on the Epistle to the Hebrews
Exercitations on the Epistle to the Hebrews also concerning the Messiah wherein the promises concerning him to be a spiritual redeemer of mankind are explained and vindicated, his coming and accomplishment of his work according to the promises is proved and confirmed, the person, or who he is, is declared, the whole economy of the mosaical law, rites, worship, and sacrifice is explained : and in all the doctrine of the person, office, and work of the Messiah is opened, the nature and demerit of the first sin is unfolded, the opinions and traditions of the ancient and modern Jews are examined, their objections against the Lord Christ and the Gospel are answered, the time of the coming of the Messiah is stated, and the great fundamental truths of the Gospel vindicated : with an exposition and discourses on the two first chapters of the said epistle to the Hebrews / by J. Owen ...Exercitations on the Epistle to the Hebrews also concerning the Messiah wherein the promises concerning him to be a spiritual redeemer of mankind are explained and vindicated, his coming and accomplishment of his work according to the promises is proved and confirmed, the person, or who he is, is declared, the whole oeconomy of the mosaical law, rites, worship, and sacrifice is explained : and in all the doctrine of the person, office, and work of the Messiah is opened, the nature and demerit of the first sin is unfolded, the opinions and traditions of the antient and modern Jews are examined, their objections against the Lord Christ and the Gospel are answered, the time of the coming of the Messiah is stated, and the great fundamental truths of the Gospel vindicated : with an exposition and discourses on the two first chapters of the said epistle to the Hebrews / by J. Owen ...
London: printed by Robert White for Nathaniel Ponder, 1668
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Others suppose [Greek or Hebrew], to signify a Son, from [Greek or Hebrew], which denotes the after birth; or Membrane wherein the Child is wrapped in the Womb. Thence [Greek or Hebrew] Shiloh should be the same with [Greek or Hebrew], his Son; [Greek or Hebrew] being put for [Greek or Hebrew], which is not unusual, saith Kimchi. But Galatinus supposeth [Greek or Hebrew], to be a feminine affix, denoting that the Messiah was to be the seed of the Woman, or to be born of a Virgin. Neither is his conjecture absolutely to ⟨p. 152⟩be rejected: Although Mercer pronounce it to be against the rule of Grammar; for we know they hold not always in things mysterious. He that would be further satisfied about the importance of the word, may consult Reymandus, Porchetus and Galatinus in their Discourses against the Jews on this subject; Kimchi, Pagnin, Mercer, Schindler, Philip ab Aquino, and Buxtorf in their Lexicons; Munst•r, Fagius, Drusius, Grotius in their Annotations on the Text; Helvicus, Rivet, Episcopius, Boethius, Hornebecke in their Discourses from it. The weight of our Argument lies not in the precise signification of the word: The Messiah it is who is intended in that expression.
Others suppose 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, to signifie a Son, from 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, which denotes the after birth; or Membrane wherein the Child is wrapt in the Womb. Thence 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 Shilo should be the same with 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, his Son; 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 being put for 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, which is not unusual, saith Kimchi. But Galatinus supposeth 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, to be a foeminine affix, denoting that the Messiah was to be the seed of the Woman, or to be born of a Virgin. Neither is his conjecture absolutely to ⟨p. 152⟩