A53737:589
A vindication of the Animadversions on Fiat lux
A vindication of the Animadversions on Fiat lux wherein the principles of the Roman church, as to moderation, unity and truth are examined and sundry important controversies concerning the rule of faith, papal supremacy, the mass, images, &c. discussed / by John Owen.
London: printed for Ph. Stephens, 1664
A Vindication of the Animadversions on Fiat Lux. › Chapter 22
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But you will retrieve us out of this Labyrinth, by a Story of what a Greek Bishop did and said at Paris in the presence of Doctor Cousins now bishop of Durham, how he refused the Articles of the English Church, and did all things according to the Roman mode, asserting the use of Liturgies in the vulgar Greek. Unto which I shall say no more, but that it was at Paris and not at Durham; Graeculus esuriens in caelum jusseris, ibit.
But you will retrive us out of this Labyrinth, by a Story of what a Greek Biship did and said at Paris in the presence of Doctor Cousins now bishop of Durham, how he refused the Articles of the English Church, and did all things according to the Roman mode, asserting the use of Liturgies in the vulgar Greek. Unto which I shall say no more, but that it was at Paris and not at Durham; Graeculus esuriens in caelum jusseris, ibit.
I have my self known some eminent members of that Church in England, two especially; one many years ago called Conopius, who if I mistake not, upon ⟨p. 552⟩his return obtained the honour of a Patriarchate, being sent hither by the then Patriarch of Constantinople; the other not many years ago, called Anastatius Comnenus Archimandrite as his Testimonials be spake him, of a Monastery on Mount Sinai. Both these I am sure made it their business to inveigh against your Church & practices, having the Arguments of Nilus against your Supremacy at their fingers ends. And if the Greek Church and you are so well agreed as you pretend, why do you censure them as Heretics and Schismatics, and receive only some few of them who are runagates from their own Tents? What may those whom you proclaim to be your enemies expect from you, when you deal thus severely with those whom you give out to be your friends? But as for this matter, of the Scripture, and prayers in an unknown tongue, though they transgress not with so high an hand as you do, the old Greeks being not so absolutely remote from the present vulgar, as the Latin is from our English, and the Languages of diverse other Nations whom you compel to your Church Service in that tongue, and besides they have the Scripture translated into their present vulgar tongue, for the use of private persons; yet we approve not their practice, but look upon it as a great means of continuing, that ignorance and darkness which is unquestionably spread over the major part of that Church: which in some places as in Russia is to such a degree, as to dispose the people unto Barbarism. We know also that herein they are gone off from the constant and Catholic usage of their forefathers, who for some Centuries of years from the days of the Apostles themselves, who planted Churches amongst them, both had the Bible in their own vulgar Tongue, and made no use of any