A55306:70
Precious faith considered in its nature, working, and growth
Precious faith considered in its nature, working, and growth by Edward Polhill ...
London: printed for Thomas Cockerill, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Fourthly, This belief must be total and absolute, ⟨p. 47⟩without any salvos or limitations. The Gospel must captivate [Greek or Hebrew], all the intellect, or every thought to the obedience of Christ, 2 Cor. 10.5. The Reason must not go at large or random, but be kept in safe custody under the Gospel and the divine mysteries thereof; it is not to be trusted to, never since the fall put an enmity into it against God. The Socinians believe the Scriptures only so far forth as they are congruous to reason; thus Socinus professes, that if this proposition (that Jesus Christ satisfied God for our sins) were once and again extant in the sacred monuments, yet non ideirco, he would not therefore believe the thing to be so as we ordinarily conceive of it: And another lays down this for a rule, Nihil credi potest, quod à ratione capi & intelligi nequeat, that cannot be believed by faith, which cannot be comprehended by reason. It seems they will trust God no further then they can see him, and depend more on their blear-eyed reason, then the divine oracle. Touching this Socinian faith, I shall endeavour to show, first the irrationality of it, and then the nullity.
Fourthly, This belief must be total and absolute, ⟨p. 47⟩without any salvoes or limitations. The Gospel must captivate 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, all the intellect, or every thought to the obedience of Christ, 2 Cor. 10.5. The Reason must not go at large or random, but be kept in safe custody under the Gospel and the divine mysteries thereof; it is not to be trusted to, never since the fall put an enmity into it against God. The Socinians believe the Scriptures only so far forth as they are congruous to reason; thus Socinus professes, that if this proposition (that Jesus Christ satisfied God for our sins) were once and again extant in the sacred monuments, yet non ideirco, he would not therefore believe the thing to be so as we ordinarily conceive of it: And another laies down this for a rule, Nihil credi potest, quod à ratione capi & intelligi nequeat, that cannot be believed by faith, which cannot be comprehended by reason. It seems they will trust God no further then they can see him, and depend more on their blear-eyed reason, then the divine oracle. Touching this Socinian faith, I shall endeavour to shew, first the inrationality of it, and then the nullity.