A57258:12
Dr. Reignolds his letter to that worthy councillor, Sir Francis Knolls concerning some passages…Dr. Reignolds his letter to that worthy councellor, Sir Francis Knolles concerning some passages…
Dr. Reignolds his letter to that worthy councillor, Sir Francis Knolls concerning some passages in Dr. Bancrofts sermon at Pauls Cross, Feb. 9. 1588. in the Parliament time. As also A question resolved by a learned doctor, whether the angels of the seven churches, Revel. 2, & 3. make for Episcopal præ-eminence Jure Divino.Dr. Reignolds his letter to that worthy councellor, Sir Francis Knolles concerning some passages in Dr. Bancrofts sermon at Pavles Crosse, Feb. 9. 1588. in the Parliament time. As also A qvestion resolved by a learned doctor, whether the angels of the seaven churches, Revel. 2, & 3. make for Episcopall præ-eminence Jure Divino.
London: printed by W.I. dwelling, 1641London: printed by W.I. dweling, 1641
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
It being once enrolled in the Cannon law for found, and Catholic doctrine, and thereupon publicly taught by learneda men; All which do bear witness against D. Bancroft, of the point in question, that it was not condemned for in Heresy by the general consent of the whole Church: For if he should reply,2 that these later witness did live a 1000 years after Christ, and therefore touch not him whob said, it was condemned so in the time of S. Austin, and ofc Epiphanius, the most flourishing time of the Church that ever happened since the Apostles days, either in respect of learning or of zeal, first they, whom I named, though living in a latter time, yet are witnesses of the former.
It being once inrolled in the Cannon law for found, and Catholike doctrine, and thereupon publikly taught by learneda men; All which do beare witnesse against D. Bancroft, of the point in question, that it was not condemned for in Heresie by the generall consent of the whole Church: For if he should reply,2 that these later witnesse did live a 1000 yeares after Christ, and therefore touch not him whob said, it was condemned so in the time of S. Austin, and ofc Epiphanius, the most flourishing time of the Church that ever happened since the Apostles dayes, either in respect of learning or of zeale, first they, whom I named, though liveing in a latter time, yet are witnesses of the former.
- aAuthor gloss. in ca dist, citat. hodericus ca••. Ave lat, inconcil, Basil, Du• ren, de sacra eccle minist. lib 1 cap. 7.