A57277:117
A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning…
A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning the same argument by the same author / written by Dr. Nicholas Ridley, Bishop of London during his imprisonment ; to which is annexed an extract of several passages to the same purpose out of a book entitled Diallacticon, written by Dr. John Poynet.A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning the same argument by the same author / written by Dr. Nicholas Ridley, Bishop of London during his imprisonment ; to which is annexed an extract of several passages to the same purpose out of a book intituled Diallacticon, written by Dr. John Poynet.
London: printed for Richard Chiswell, 1688
A BRIEF DECLARATION OF THE Lords Supper.A BREEFE DECLARATION OF THE Lordes Supper.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This Author wrote (say they) before the determination of the Church. As who would say, whatsoever that wicked man Innocentius the Pope of Rome determined in his congregations with his monks and friars, that must be (for so Duns saith) holden for an article, and of the substance of our faith. Some do charge this 1author that he was suspected to be a Nestorian, which thing in Calcedon Counsel was tried and proved to be false. But the foulest shift of all, and yet the best that they can find in this matter, when none other will serve: is to say, that Theodoret understandeth by the word (substance) accidents, and not substance indeed.
This Author wrote (say they) before the determination of the Churche. As who would say, whatsoever that wicked man Innocentius the Pope of Rome determined in his congregationes with his monks and friers, that must be (for so Duns saith) holden for an article, and of the substance of our faith. Some doo charge this 1author that he was suspected to be a Nestorian, which thing in Calcedon Counsaile was tryed and prooued to be false. But the foulest shift of al, and yet the best that they can finde in this matter, when none other will serue: is to say, that Theodoret vnderstandeth by the woord (substance) accidents, and not substance indéed.
- 1D. Moreman in the Conu• cation house.
This gloss is like a gloss of a lawyer, upon a decree, the text whereof beginning thus: Statuimus, that is, We decree. The gloss of the Lawyer there (after many other pretty shifts there set forth) which he thinketh will not well serve to his purpose, and therefore at the last to clear the matter, he saith thus: after the mind of one Lawyer. Vel dic (saith he) Statuimus id est, abrogamus, that is: 1