A57277:186
A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning…
A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning the same argument by the same author / written by Dr. Nicholas Ridley, Bishop of London during his imprisonment ; to which is annexed an extract of several passages to the same purpose out of a book entitled Diallacticon, written by Dr. John Poynet.A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning the same argument by the same author / written by Dr. Nicholas Ridley, Bishop of London during his imprisonment ; to which is annexed an extract of several passages to the same purpose out of a book intituled Diallacticon, written by Dr. John Poynet.
London: printed for Richard Chiswell, 1688
Mr. FOX 2d Volume of Acts and Monuments, Edit. London, 1684.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Langdale. I will prove it by another means. Christ did suffer 1his most glorious passion for us really and substantially; Ergo, He is also in the Sacrament substantially. The Argument is good, because that it is the same here that was there crucified for us; howbeit here invisibly, indeed spiritually and sacramentally, but there visibly, and after a mortal and most bloody manner.
- 1P. 109.
Rochest. Mr. Langdale, your Argument doth well conclude, in case that his Body were here in the Sacrament after such a sort as it was when it was betrayed: But that is not so; for he was betrayed and crucified in his natural body substantially and really in very deed; but in the Sacrament he is not so, but spiritually and figuratively only.
Langd. By your good Lordships favour that is not so, for he is there not figuratively, but verily and indeed by the power of his mighty Word, yea even his very own natural body under the Sacrament duly performed by the lawful Minister.