A57277:337
A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning…
A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning the same argument by the same author / written by Dr. Nicholas Ridley, Bishop of London during his imprisonment ; to which is annexed an extract of several passages to the same purpose out of a book entitled Diallacticon, written by Dr. John Poynet.A brief declaration of the Lords Supper with some other determinations and disputations concerning the same argument by the same author / written by Dr. Nicholas Ridley, Bishop of London during his imprisonment ; to which is annexed an extract of several passages to the same purpose out of a book intituled Diallacticon, written by Dr. John Poynet.
London: printed for Richard Chiswell, 1688
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
There is ambiguity also in the name of Mass: what it signifieth, and whether at this day there be any such indeed as the Ancient Fathers used; seeing that now there be neither Catecumeni nor Penitents to be sent away.
There is ambiguity also in the name of Mass: what it signifieth, and whether at this day there be any such indeed as the Ancient Fathers used; seeing that now there be neither Catecumeni nor Poenitentes to be sent away.
Again, touching these words (The lively Sacrifice of the Church) There is doubt whether they are to be understood Figuratively and Sacramentally, for the Sacrament of the lively Sacrifice (after which sort we deny it not to be in the Lord's Supper) or properly and without any figure; of the which manner there was but one only Sacrifice, and that once offered, namely upon the Altar of the Cross.
Moreover, in these words (as well as) it may be doubted whether they be spoken in mockage as men are wont to say in sport, of a foolish and ignorant person, that he is apt as well in conditions as in knowledge, being apt indeed in neither of them both.
Moreover, in these words (as well as) it may be doubted whether they be spoken in mockage as men are wont to say in sport, of a foolish and ignorant person, that he is apt as well in conditions as in knowledg, being apt indeed in neither of them both.