A57975:111
Lex, Rex
Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the aid and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet entitled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royal prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelate. : with a scriptural confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the ayd and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet intituled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royall prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelat. : with a scripturall confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.
London: printed for John Field, 1644London: printed for Iohn Field, 1644
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
QUEST. XXXV. Whether the sufferings of the Martyrs in the Primitive Church Militant be against the lawfulness of defensive wars. p. 369, 370. Tertullian neither ours nor theirs in the question of defensive wars, p. 370, 371, 372.
QUEST. XXXV. Whether the sufferings of the Martyrs in the Primitive Church Militant be against the lawfulnesse of defensive warrs. p. 369, 370. Tertullian neither ours nor theirs in the question of defensive warrs, p. 370, 371, 372.
QUEST. XXXVI. Whether the King have the power of war only? Negatur. p. 372, 373. Inferior Judges have the power of the sword no less then the King. p. 372, 373. The people tied to acts of charity, and to defend themselves, the Church, and their posterity against a foreign enemy, though the King forbid. p. 373, 374. Flying unlawful to the States of Scotland and England now, Gods Law tying them to defend their Country. p. 374. Parliamentary Power a fountain-power above the King, p. 376, 377.
QUEST. XXXVI. Whether the King have the power of warre only? Negatur. p. 372, 373. Inferiour Iudges have the power of the sword no lesse then the King. p. 372, 373. The people tyed to acts of charity, and to defend themselves, the Church, and their posterity against a forraigne enemy, though the King forbid. p. 373, 374. Flying unlawfull to the States of Scotland and England now, Gods Law tying them to defend their Country. p. 374. Parliamentary Power a fountain-power above the King, p. 376, 377.