A57975:117
Lex, Rex
Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the aid and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet entitled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royal prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelate. : with a scriptural confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the ayd and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet intituled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royall prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelat. : with a scripturall confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.
London: printed for John Field, 1644London: printed for Iohn Field, 1644
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
QUEST. XLI. Whether doth the P. P. with reason ascribe to us the doctrine of Jesuits, in the Question of lawful defence? Negatur, p. 410, 411, 412. That Sovereignty is originally and radically in the people, as in the Fountain, was taught by Fathers, ancient Doctors, sound Divines, Lawyers, before there was a Jesuit, or a Prelate whelped, in rerum natura, p. 413. The P. P. holdeth the Pope to be the Vicar of Christ, p. 414, 415. Jesuits tenets concerning Kings, p. 415, 416, 417. The King not the peoples Deputy by our doctrine; it is only the calumny of the P. Prelate, p. 417, 418. The P. P. will have power to act the bloodiest tyrannies on earth, upon the Church of Christ, the essential power of a King, ibid.
QUEST. XLI. Whether doth the P. P. with reason ascribe to us the doctrine of Jesuites, in the Question of lawfull defence? Negatur, p. 410, 411, 412. That Soveraignty is originally and radically in the people, as in the Fountain, was taught by Fathers, ancient Doctors, sound Divines, Lawyers, before there was a Jesuite, or a Prelate whelped, in rerum natura, p. 413. The P. P. holdeth the Pope to be the Vicar of Christ, p. 414, 415. Iesuites tenets concerning Kings, p. 415, 416, 417. The King not the peoples Deputie by our doctrine; it is onely the calumnie of the P. Prelate, p. 417, 418. The P. P. will have power to act the bloodiest tyrannies on earth, upon the Church of Christ, the essentiall power of a King, ibid.
QUEST. XLII. Whether all Christian Kings are dependent from Christ, and may be called his Vicegerents, Negatur, p. 422. Why God as God, hath a man a Vicegerent under him, but not as Mediator, p. 422, 423. The King not head of the Church, ibid. The King a sub-mediator, and an under redeemer, and a sub-priest to offer sacrifices to God for us, if he be a Vicegerent, p. 423. The King no mixed person, ibid. Prelates deny Kings to be subject to the Gospel, p. 426, 427. By no Prerogative Royal, may the King prescribe religious observances, and humane ceremonies in Gods worship, p. 424, 425. The P. P. giveth to the King a power Arbitrary, supreme and independent to govern the Church, p. 429, 430.