A57975:449
Lex, Rex
Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the aid and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet entitled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royal prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelate. : with a scriptural confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the ayd and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet intituled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royall prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelat. : with a scripturall confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.
London: printed for John Field, 1644London: printed for Iohn Field, 1644
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Object. 3. The collective University of a Kingdom are subjects, sons, and the King their father, no less then this or that subject is the Kings subject. For the university of Subjects are either the King, or the King subjects: for all the kingdom must be one of these two; but they are not the King, Ergo, they are his subjects.
Object. 3. The collective Vniversitie of a Kingdome are subjects, sonnes, and the King their father, no lesse then this or that subject is the Kings subject. For the universitie of Subjects are either the King, or the King subjects: for all the kingdome must be one of these two; but they are not the King, Ergo, they are his subjects.
Answ. All the Kingdom in any consideration is not either King or Subjects. I give a third: The Kingdom collective is neither properly King nor Subject: but the Kingdom embodied in a State, having collateral or coordinate power with the King.
Answ. All the Kingdome in any consideration is not either King or Subjects. I give a third: The Kingdome collective is neither properly King nor Subject: but the Kingdome embodied in a State, having collaterall or coordinate power with the King.
Object. 4. The university is ruled by laws, Ergo, they are inferior to the King who ruleth all by law.
Object. 4. The universitie is ruled by lawes, Ergo, they are inferior to the King who ruleth all by law.