A57975:89
Lex, Rex
Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the aid and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet entitled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royal prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelate. : with a scriptural confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the ayd and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet intituled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royall prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelat. : with a scripturall confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.
London: printed for John Field, 1644London: printed for Iohn Field, 1644
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
QUEST. XIII. Whether or no Royal Dignity have its spring from Nature, and how that is true (every man is borne free) and how servitude is contrary to nature; Affir. 89. Seven sorts of superiority and inferiority. pag. 89, 90. Power of life and death from a positive Law. ibid. A Dominion antecedent and consequent. 90. Kings and subjects no natural order. ibid. A man is borne, consequenter, in politic relation. pag. 91. Slavery not natural from four reasons. ibid. Every man borne free in regard of civill subjection (not in regard of natural, such as of children, and wife to Parents and Husband) proved by seven Arguments. pag. 91, 92, 93. Politic Government how necessary, how natural. pag. 94. That Parents should enslave their children, not natural. pag. 95.
QUEST. XIII. Whether or no Royall Dignity have its spring from Nature, and how that is true (every man is borne free) and how servitude is contrary to nature; Affir. 89. Seven sorts of superiority and inferiority. pag. 89, 90. Power of life and death from a positive Law. ibid. A Dominion antecedent and consequent. 90. Kings and subjects no naturall order. ibid. A man is borne, consequenter, in politick relation. pag. 91. Slavery not naturall from four reasons. ibid. Every man borne free in regard of civill subjection (not in regard of naturall, such as of children, and wife to Parents and Husband) proved by seven Arguments. pag. 91, 92, 93. Politique Government how necessary, how naturall. pag. 94. That Parents should inslave their children, not naturall. pag. 95.
QUEST. XIV. Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely; and whether the King be tied by any such covenant? pag. 96. The King under a natural, but no civill obligation to the people, as Royalists teach. ibid. The Covenant civilly tieth the King, proved by Scriptures and reasons, by 8. Argu. ibid. & sequent. If the condition without which one of the parties would never have entered in Covenant, be not performed, that party is loosed from the Covenant. pag. 97. The people and Princes are obliged in their places for Justice and Religion, no less then the King. pag. 98. In so far as the King presseth a false Religion on the people, eatenus, in so far they are understood not to have a King. pag. 99.