A57975:90
Lex, Rex
Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the aid and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet entitled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royal prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelate. : with a scriptural confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.Lex, rex The law and the prince : a dispute for the just prerogative of king and people : containing the reasons and causes of the most necessary defensive wars of the kingdom of Scotland and of their expedition for the ayd and help of their dear brethren of England : in which their innocency is asserted and a full answer is given to a seditious pamphlet intituled Sacro-sancta regum majestas, or, The sacred and royall prerogative of Christian kings, under the name of J. A. but penned by Jo. Maxwell the excommunicate P. Prelat. : with a scripturall confutation of the ruinous grounds of W. Barclay, H. Grotius, H. Arnisœus, Ant. de Domi P. Bishop of Spalata, and of other late anti-magistratical royalists, as the author of Ossorianum, D. Fern, E. Symmons, the doctors of Aberdeen, &c. : in XLIV questions.
London: printed for John Field, 1644London: printed for Iohn Field, 1644
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
QUEST. XIV. Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely; and whether the King be tied by any such covenant? pag. 96. The King under a natural, but no civill obligation to the people, as Royalists teach. ibid. The Covenant civilly tieth the King, proved by Scriptures and reasons, by 8. Argu. ibid. & sequent. If the condition without which one of the parties would never have entered in Covenant, be not performed, that party is loosed from the Covenant. pag. 97. The people and Princes are obliged in their places for Justice and Religion, no less then the King. pag. 98. In so far as the King presseth a false Religion on the people, eatenus, in so far they are understood not to have a King. pag. 99. ⟨image 13⟩The Covenant giveth a mutual coactive power to King and people, to compel each other, though there be not one in earth higher then both to compel each of them. pag. 100. The Covenant bindeth the King as King, not as he is a man only. pag. 101. One or two Tyrannous acts deprive not the King of his Royal right. pag. 104. Though there were no positive written Covenant (which yet we grant not) yet there is a natural, tacit, implicit Covenant tying the King, by the nature of his Office. pag. 106 If the King be made King absolutely, it is contrary to Scripture, and the nature of his Office. pag. 107. The people given to the King as a pledge, not as if they became his own to dispose of at his absolute will. pag. 108. The King could not buy, sell, borrow, if no Covenant should tie him to men. ibid. The Covenant sworn by Judah, 2 Chro. 15. tied the King. pag. 109.
QUEST. XIV. Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely; and whether the King be tyed by any such covenant? pag. 96. The King under a naturall, but no civill obligation to the people, as Royalists teach. ibid. The Covenant civilly tyeth the King, proved by Scriptures and reasons, by 8. Argu. ibid. & sequent. Jf the condition without which one of the parties would never have entered in Covenant, be not performed, that party is loosed from the Covenant. pag. 97. The people and Princes are obliged in their places for Iustice and Religion, no lesse then the King. pag. 98. In so farre as the King presseth a false Religion on the people, eatenus, in so farre they are understood not to have a King. pag. 99.