A57976:151
A peaceable and temperate plea for Pauls presbytery in Scotland, or, A modest and…A peaceable and temperate plea for Pauls presbyterie in Scotland, or, A modest and…
A peaceable and temperate plea for Pauls presbytery in Scotland, or, A modest and brotherly dispute of the government of the Church of Scotland wherein our discipline is demonstrated to be the true apostolic way of divine truth, and the arguments on the contrary are friendly dissolved, the grounds of separation and the independency [sic] of particular congregations, in defence of ecclesiastical presbyteries, synods, and assemblies, are examined and tried / by Samuel Rutherfurd ...A peaceable and temperate plea for Pauls presbyterie in Scotland, or, A modest and brotherly dispute of the government of the Church of Scotland wherein our discipline is demonstrated to be the true apostolick way of divine truth, and the arguments on the contrary are friendly dissolved, the grounds of separation and the indepencie [sic] of particular congregations, in defence of ecclesiasticall presbyteries, synods, and assemblies, are examined and tryed / by Samuell Rutherfurd ...
London: printed for John Bartlet, 1642London: printed for Iohn Bartlet, 1642
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And Augustine, and Tertullian, and Chrysostom seem to favour this. So Maldonate, Ferus, Jansenius, Sutluvius, Whittaker, Morton, Spalato, Gerson, Almain, Petr. de Alliac. Also Edmundus Richerius, and Sim. Vegorius set out a book of Church policy, depressing the Pope, and extolling the Church power as full and complete without a ministerial head, 1as their own Parisian Doctors acknowledging the command of having a Pope to be affirmative, and not to bind always, and that the Churches power remaineth full when the Pope is dead, as the Parisians say, p. 8. The book came out without the name of an Author, and was condemned by Cardinal Peronius, Archbishop of Senona, 2and Primate of France and Germany, and is refuted by Andreas Duvallius a Sorbonist. What our Divines say in this, I have exponed to be far otherwise then is the mind of Parker, 3M. Jacob, M. Best, and the Authors of presbyterial government examined, Ann. 1641.
And Augustine, and Tertullian, and Chrysostome seeme to favour this. So Maldonate, Ferus, Jansenius, Sutluvius, Whittaker, Morton, Spalato, Gerson, Almain, Petr. de Alliac. Also Edmundus Richerius, and Sim. Vegorius set out a booke of Church policy, depressing the Pope, and extolling the Church power as full and compleat without a ministeriall head, 1as their owne Parisian Doctors acknowledging the command of having a Pope to be affirmative, and not to bind alwayes, and that the Churches power remaineth full when the Pope is dead, as the Parisians say, p. 8. The booke came out without the name of an Authour, and was condemned by Cardinall Peronius, Archbishop of Senona, 2and Primate of France and Germany, and is refuted by Andreas Duvallius a Sorbonist. What our Divines say in this, I have exponed to be far otherwise then is the mind of Parker, 3M. Jacob, M. Best, and the Authours of presbyteriall government examined, Ann. 1641.