A57980:198
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in…A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in…
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...
London: printed by J.D. & R.I. for Andrew Crooke, 1648
Part 1 › Chapter 5: Of Casper Swenckfield his Tenets complying with Antinomians.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
7 The chief argument of Swenckefeld was because Christ as man obtained a name above all names, was adored as man: but if •his stand sure, then in the state of humiliation aswell as glorification the manhood was changed in the nature of God which yet Swenckefeldius denies; for in the state of humiliation what is proper to the Godhead, is ascribed to the Manhood, ⟨p. 19⟩per [Greek or Hebrew] as God purchased a Church by his blood whereas God hath no blood: they Crucified the Lord of glory and by this argument, we may well infer that the God-head in the state of humiliation was changed into the manhood and flesh which is blasphemous, for so should God die as man dyed: and there was a book given out in the name of Swenckefeldius that denies the manhood of Christ after his resurrection to be a creature and calleth all of the contrary mind Creaturistae. hence
7 The cheife argument of Swenckefeld was because Christ as man obtained a name above all names, was adored as man: but if •his stand sure, then in the state of humiliation aswell as glorification the manhood was changed in the nature of God which yet Swenckefeldius denyes; for in the state of humiliation what is proper to the Godhead, is ascribed to the Man•hood, ⟨p. 19⟩per 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 as God purchased a Church by his blood whereas God hath no blood: they Crucified the Lord of glory and by this argument, we may well inferre that the God-head in the state of humiliation was changed into the manhood and flesh which is blasphemous, for so should God die as man dyed: and there was a booke given out in the name of Swenckefeldius that denyes the manhood of Christ after his resurrection to be a creature and calleth all of the contrary minde Creaturistae. hence