A57980:35
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in…A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in…
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...
London: printed by J.D. & R.I. for Andrew Crooke, 1648
Letter: A brotherly and free Epistle to the patrons and friends of pretended Liberty of Conscie…
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. Whether or not, he and his brethren who did plead against the Assembly of Divines in favours of an Erastian party, do not stir up both Prince and Parliament in both Kingdoms in this very cause, to bring on a National guilt on the land to enslave the free Kingdom of Christ to the powers of the world, and whether in this do they not build the sepulchres of the Prophets, and bring upon their own heads the blood of the slain witnesses of Christ?
2. Whether or not, he and his brethren who did plead against the Assembly of Divines in favours of an Erastian party, doe not stirre up both Prince and Parliament in both Kingdomes in this very cause, to bring on a Nationall guilt on the land to inslave the free Kingdome of Christ to the powers of the world, and whether in this doe they not build the sepulchres of the Prophets, and bring upon their owne heads the blood of the slaine witnesses of Christ?
3. Whether a distinction will help them at the bar of Gods justice, that they sided in hatred of the Presbyterial government, and of their brethren of Scotland, with Erastians, in opposing truths of Christ in these and the major proposition, against the light of their own conscience, in laying the headship of the Church of Christ on the shoulder of King and Parliament, and then keep in their mind, a mental reserve of the Presbyterial Church only?
3. Whether a distinction will helpe them at the barre of Gods justice, that they sided in hatred of the Presbyteriall government, and of their brethren of Scotland, with Erastians, in opposing truths of Christ in these and the major proposition, against the light of their owne conscience, in laying the headship of the Church of Christ on the shoulder of King and Parliament, and then keep in their minde, a mentall reserve of the Presbyteriall Church only?