A57980:667
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in…A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in…
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...
London: printed by J.D. & R.I. for Andrew Crooke, 1648
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But nothing of the blessed Trinity is here, nothing of the Gospel, of Christ, God man, of the justification of the ungodly by faith and the rest of our Articles of faith, but only of a mere legal way to heaven, as if they were in the state of innocency. So they extol fleshly Henry Nicholas and his doctrine that disclaims all the protestant faith. 2. They will not have the scriptures a rule of faith, but as they understand them.
But nothing of the blessed Trinity is here, nothing of the Gospel, of Christ, God man, of the justification of the ungodly by faith and the rest of our Articles of faith, but only of a mere legall way to heaven, as if they were in the state of innocencie. So they extoll fleshly Henry Nicholas and his doctrine that disclaimes all the protestant faith. 2. They will not have the scriptures a rule of faith, but as they understand them.
5 They complain that H. Nicho. is shamefully slandered, and his disciples traduced, persecuted and imprisoned.
5 They complaine that H. Nicho. is shamefully slandred, and his disciples traduced, persecuted and imprisoned.
6 That nothing could ever be proved against them. But that was because they hold it lawful to deny Christ and their religion before men, what then could be proved against them?
6 That nothing could ever bee proved against them. But that was because they hold it lawfull to deny Christ and their religion before men, what then could bee proved against them?