A57980:827
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in…A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in…
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...
London: printed by J.D. & R.I. for Andrew Crooke, 1648
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2 That these are from Christ efficienter, as the efficient cause or from the spirit of Christ infusing the life of God in us, and actuating the supernatural habit of grace in us and working in us to will and to do, this is that which Protestant Divines say, that Christ is our Saviour merito and efficaciâ, by the merit of his death, against Papists, and the effectual; yea, and the irresistible applying of his death to save us, as we teach against Papists, Pelagians, Socinians, then surely I hope neither that learned man M. Gattaker, nor any of ours censured M. Saltmarsh for Antinomianism or any heresy, in his point we agree, and then we say that M. Saltmarsh in these words, gives us a fair and ingenious Recantation. I am glad of this.
2 That these are from Christ efficienter, as the efficient cause or from the spirit of Christ infusing the life of God in us, and actuating the supernaturall habit of grace in us and working in us to wil and to do, this is that which Protestant Divines say, that Christ is our Savior merito and efficaciâ, by the merit of his death, against Papists, and the effectuall; yea, and the irresistable applying of his death to save us, as we teach against Papists, Pelagians, Socinians, then surely I hope neither that learned man M. Gattaker, nor any of ours censured M. Saltmarsh for Antinomianisme or any heresie, in his point we agree, and then we say that M. Saltmarsh in these words, gives us a faire and ingenious Recantation. I am glad of this.
But Saltmarsh will be found to wash Antinomianism off himself with Ink-water, and he hath no face, at least it is much ignorance to call Protestants Legallists, because they teach that our faith, repentance, and mortification are from Christ by way of merit and the effectual working of grace, nor did ever Protestant deny this.
But Saltmarsh will be found to wash Antinomianisme off himselfe with Ink-water, and he hath no face, at least it is much ignorance to call Protestants Legallists, because they teach that our faith, repentance, and mortification are from Christ by way of merit and the effectuall working of grace, nor did ever Protestant deny this.