A57980:97
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in…A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in…
A survey of the spiritual antichrist opening the secrets of familism and antinomianism in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ...
London: printed by J.D. & R.I. for Andrew Crooke, 1648
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. Libertines professed they would speak so ambiguously, as their words might carry two senses, because Christ preached dark parables to the people: Antinomians have not to this day explained in their writings, whether the justified can sin or no; •ut in practice they say they may, lye, whore, swear, cousin; God seeth no such sins in them.
4. Libertines professed they would speak so ambiguously, as their words might cary two senses, because Christ preached darke parables to the people: Antinomians have not to this day explained in their writings, whether the justified can sin or no; •ut in practice they say they may, lye, whore, sweare, cousen; God seeth no such sinnes in them.
5. Nothing was more frequent with Libertines, then the Spirit, the Spirit, Antinomians say, to preach duties, to rebuke sin, is not a Spiritual strain of Gospel-preaching, it's legal, literal, Moses-like, not Christ-like.
5. Nothing was more frequent with Libertines, then the Spirit, the Spirit, Antinomians say, to preach duties, to rebuke sinne, is not a Spirituall straine of Gospell-preaching, it's legall, literall, Moses-like, not Christ-like.
The chief errors of Libertines, which I prove to be holden expressly,1 or by undeniable consequences by Antinomians and Familists are these.
The chiefe errors of Libertines, which I prove to be holden expresly,