A57982:35
The trial & triumph of faithThe tryal & triumph of faith
The trial & triumph of faith: or, An exposition of the history of Christs dispossessing of the daughter of the woman of Canaan Delivered in sermons; in which are opened, the victory of faith; the condition of those that are tempted; the excellency of Jesus Christ and free-grace; and some special grounds and principles of libertinism and antinomian errors, discovered by Samuel Rutherfurd, professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews. Published by authority.The tryal & triumph of faith: or, An exposition of the history of Christs dispossessing of the daughter of the woman of Canaan Delivered in sermons; in which are opened, the victory of faith; the condition of those that are tempted; the excellency of Jesus Christ and free-grace; and some speciall grounds and principles of libertinisme and antinomian errors, discovered by Samuel Rutherfurd, professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews. Published by authority.
London: printed by John Field, 1652
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
SERM. XIX. The Lord Jesus is so made the sinner in suffering for sin, as there remaineth no sin in the sinner once pardoned, as Antinomians teach, especially Doctor Crisp, p. 235. Sin so laid on Christ as that it leaveth not off to be our sin, 238 The guilt of sin & sin it self, are not one & the same thing, 241. An inherent blot in sin, and the guilt and debt of sin, ibid. Two things in debt, as in sin, p, 242. The blot of sin, two ways considered, ibid. A twofold guilt in sin, one intrinsical, and of the fault; another of the punishment, and extrinsical, p. 244. Reasons why sin, and the guilt of sin cannot be the same, 245 Christ not intrinsically the sinner, p. 250. ⟨image 14⟩Imputation of sin, no imagination, no lie, p. 251. Reasons proving that Christ was not intrinsically and formally the sinner, p. 253. What righteousness of Christ is made ours, p. 256. The believer how righteous, and Christ how not, p. 257. Christs bearing of our sins by a frequent Hebraism in Scripture, is to bear the punishment due to our sins, and not to bear the intrinsical blot of our sins, p. 263. How Christ is in our place, p. 265. How the debtor and the surety be one in Law, and not intrinsically one, p. 267. A perplexed conscience in a good sense is lawfully consistent with a justified sinners condition, p. 269. A conditional fear of eternal wrath required in the justified, but not an absolute fear, and yet trouble of mind for the indwelling of sin is required, p. 271.
SERM. XIX. The Lord Jesus is so made the sinner in suffering for sin, as there remaineth no sin in the sinner once pardoned, as Antinomians teach, especially Doctor Crispe, p. 235. Sin so laid on •hrist as that it leaveth not off to be our sin, 238 The guilt of sin & sin it self, are not one & the same thing, 241. An inherent blot in sin, and the guilt and debt of sin, ibid. Two things in debt, as in sin, p, 242. The blot of sin, two wayes considered, ibid. A twofold guilt in sin, one intrinsecall, and of the fault; another of the punishment, and extrinsecall, p. 244. Reasons why sin, and the guilt of sin cannot be the same, 245 Christ not intrinsecally the sinner, p. 250.