A60194:2503
A learned commentary or exposition
A learned commentary or exposition: upon the first chapter of the second Epistle of S. Paul to the Corinthians Being the substance of many sermons formerly preached at Gray's-Inn, London, by that reverend and judicious divine, Richard Sibbs, D.D. Sometimes Master of Catherine-Hall in Cambridge, and preacher to that honourable society. Published for the public good and benefit of the Church of Christ. By Tho. Manton, B.D. and preacher of the Gospel at Stoke-Newington, near London.A learned commentary or exposition: upon the first chapter of the second Epistle of S. Paul to the Corinthians Being the substance of many sermons formerly preached at Grayes-Inne, London, by that reverend and judicious divine, Richard Sibbs, D.D. Sometimes Master of Catherine-Hall in Cambridge, and preacher to that honourable society. Published for the publick good and benefit of the Church of Christ. By Tho. Manton, B.D. and preacher of the Gospel at Stoake-Newington, near London.
London: printed by J.L. for N.B., 1655
A COMMENTARY upon the first CHAPTER of the second Epistle of S. PAU… › Commentary on verse 19
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
In those things wherein they differ from us, and that we deny, any understanding, reasonable man may see that they are novelties, and corruptions. As for the Pope to depose Princes, if a man have but his naturals, he may see it abominable. To pray in a strange tongue, to debar the people of the wine, when Christ saith, Drink ye all of it; who that hath ordinary discretion but will think it absurd? There is nothing that we differ from them in, but a man that hath but his naturals will condemn. Therefore ours is safer a great deal by their own confession, the learnedest of them, that it is enough to believe as we do. Do we not believe the Articles of the Creed? do we not believe the first four general Councils? we do; who then will not say that these are sufficient being understood, and believed, to make a man that he be no heretic?
In those things wherein they differ from us, and that we deny, any understanding, reasonable man may see that they are novelties, and corruptions. As for the Pope to depose Princes, if a man have but his naturals, he may see it abominable. To pray in a strange tongue, to debar the people of the wine, when Christ saith, Drink ye all of it; who that hath ordinary discretion but will think it absurd? There is nothing that we differ from them in, but a man that hath but his naturals will condemne. Therefore ours is safer a great deal by their own confession, the learnedest of them, that it is enough to believe as we do. Do we not believe the Articles of the Creed? do we not believe the first four generall Councels? we do; who then will not say that these are sufficient being understood, and believed, to make a man that he be no heretick?
I may answer hence another question, whether a Papist may be saved or 1no? It is a curious question, you will say; but it is so ordinary, that somewhat I must say.
- 1Quest.