A60427:36
Transubstantiation examined and confuted in two sermons on the Lord's Supper / preached in…Transusbstantiation examin'd and confuted in two sermons on the Lord's Supper / preach'd in…
Transubstantiation examined and confuted in two sermons on the Lord's Supper / preached in the reign of Queen Elizabeth by H. Smith, sometime preacher at St. Clement Danes.Transusbstantiation examin'd and confuted in two sermons on the Lord's Supper / preach'd in the reign of Queen Elizabeth by H. Smith, sometime preacher at St. Clement Danes.
London: printed by J. Wallis, 1688
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Again, Christ saith not, This Wine, but This Cup: and therefore by their conclusion, not only the Wine should be turned into Blood, but the Cup too.
Again, Paul saith, They which receive unworthily, receive their own damnation. But if it were the Flesh of Christ, they should rather receive salvation than damnation, because Christ saith: He that eateth my Flesh, and drinketh my Blood, hath life everlasting. John 6. 54.
Again, if they would hear an Angel from Heaven: when Christ's Body was glorified, an Angel saith to the Woman, He is risen, and is not here, Mat. 28. as if he should say; his Body is but in one place at once, or else he might have been there though he was risen.
Again, why do they say in receiving this Sacrament, ever since the Primitive Church, Lift up your Hearts, if they have all in their Mouths? To end this controversy, here we may say as the Disciples said to Christ, Whither shall we go from thee? I mean we need not to go to any other expositor of Christ then Christ himself, therefore mark what he saith: at first, when