A64001:389
Of the morality of the fourth commandment as still in force to bind Christians…Of the morality of the fourth commandement as still in force to binde Christians…
Of the morality of the fourth commandment as still in force to bind Christians delivered by way of answer to the translator of Doctor Prideaux his lecture, concerning the doctrine of the Sabbath ... / written by William Twice ...Of the morality of the fourth commandement as still in force to binde Christians delivered by way of answer to the translator of Doctor Prideaux his lecture, concerning the doctrine of the Sabbath ... / written by William Twisse ...
London: printed by E.G. for John Rothwell, 1641London: printed by E.G. for Iohn Rothwell, 1641
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
17. I conclude then, that the fourth Commandment is not an introduction, but a declaratory Law.
17. I conclude then, that the fourth Commandement is not an introduction, but a declaratory Law.
18 But moreover I add, that when it was delivered to the Jews there was superadded, a distinguishing reference to that Church.
18 But moreover I adde, that when it was delivered to the Jewes there was superadded, a distinguishing reference to that Church.
19. For it was prescribed as a sign of Gods sanctifying residence amongst them; and a memorial of their freedom from Egyptian bondage.
19. For it was prescribed as a signe of Gods sanctifying residence amongst them; and a memoriall of their freedome from Egyptian bondage.