A64001:429
Of the morality of the fourth commandment as still in force to bind Christians…Of the morality of the fourth commandement as still in force to binde Christians…
Of the morality of the fourth commandment as still in force to bind Christians delivered by way of answer to the translator of Doctor Prideaux his lecture, concerning the doctrine of the Sabbath ... / written by William Twice ...Of the morality of the fourth commandement as still in force to binde Christians delivered by way of answer to the translator of Doctor Prideaux his lecture, concerning the doctrine of the Sabbath ... / written by William Twisse ...
London: printed by E.G. for John Rothwell, 1641London: printed by E.G. for Iohn Rothwell, 1641
Doctor LAKE Bishop of BATH, and Wells, Theses de Sabbato. › Question 2. Sect. 1.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
By Sabbath you must understand the Lords Day, otherwise none but Heretics hold this opinion.
By Sabbath you must understand the Lords Day, otherwise none but Hereticks hold this opinion.
Then I think the proportion of time is perpetual Thesi 15; though if you look to the assignation of the day, it is not perpetual; sin hath altered it occasionally, and God Causally; absque hoc it was intended that it should be perpetual, Thesi 26.
Then I thinke the proportion of time is perpetuall Thesi 15; though if you looke to the assiguation of the day, it is not perpetuall; sin hath altered it occasionally, and God Causally; absque hoc it was intended that it should be perpetuall, Thesi 26.
But whether is the observation of the Lords Day moral?
But whether is the observation of the Lords Day morall?