A64001:527
Of the morality of the fourth commandment as still in force to bind Christians…Of the morality of the fourth commandement as still in force to binde Christians…
Of the morality of the fourth commandment as still in force to bind Christians delivered by way of answer to the translator of Doctor Prideaux his lecture, concerning the doctrine of the Sabbath ... / written by William Twice ...Of the morality of the fourth commandement as still in force to binde Christians delivered by way of answer to the translator of Doctor Prideaux his lecture, concerning the doctrine of the Sabbath ... / written by William Twisse ...
London: printed by E.G. for John Rothwell, 1641London: printed by E.G. for Iohn Rothwell, 1641
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Secondly, that Extra scandalum, a man may transgress it. For example, a Tradesman may work in his Chamber, if no body be privy to it.
Secondly, that Extra scandalum, a man may transgresse it. For example, a Tradesman may worke in his Chamber, if no body bee privy to it.
If this be the Commentary upon Libera observatio (and if it be well inquired into, you will find that I do not mistake the meaning) then I profess I cannot like of such a Libera observatio.
If this be the Commentary upon Libera observatio (and if it be well inquired into, you will finde that I doe not mistake the meaning) then I professe I cannot like of such a Libera observatio.
For I am persuaded that if all Christendom should meet, and have never so plausible a ground, they cannot alter the day de jure, though de facto they may; but it is worse then peevishness so to do. And why? they cannot alter the first ground, Christs rising upon that day. Secondly, they cannot alter the uniform order that upon that undeniable ground was set down by the Apostles themselves, which were infallibly guided by the Holy Ghost.
For I am perswaded that if all Christendome should meete, and have never so plausible a ground, they cannot alter the day de jure, though de facto they may; but it is worse then p•evishnesse so to doe. And why? they cannot alter the first ground, Christs rising upon that day. Secondly, they cannot alter the uniforme order that upon that undenyable ground was set down by the Apostles themselves, which were infallibly guided by the Holy Ghost.