A64002:132
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. The third is, Where by he decreed sufficiently and efficaciously to administer the means which are necessary to faith and repentance. This decree whether he conceives it to be absolute or no, he doth not specify; nor whether he decreed to administer them unto all, nor by whom, whether by men only, or by men or Angels, nor whether by means he understands the Gospel only, and we have cause to doubt thereof. And lastly, which is most obscure, he doth not explicate what he means, by sufficient and efficacious administration. Only he adds, that in this administration, he carries himself according, 1. To his Wisdom, which shows what becomes his mercy and severity, and 2ly to his Justice, whereby he is ready to follow the prescript of his Wisdom.
3. The third is, Where by he decreed sufficiently and efficaciously to administer the means which are necessary to faith and repentance. This decree whether he conceives it to be absolute or no, he doth not specify; nor whether he decreed to administer them unto all, nor by whom, whether by men only, or by men or Angells, nor whether by means he understands the Gospel only, and we have cause to doubt thereof. And lastly, which is most obscure, he doth not explicate what he means, by sufficient and efficacious administration. Only he adds, that in this administration, he carries himselfe according, 1. To his Wisdome, which shewes what becomes his mercy andseverity, and 2ly to his Justice, whereby he is ready to follow the prescript of his Wisdome.
4. The fourth and last is, Whereby he decreed to save and damn certain particular persons. Now whereas our Divines generally, what way soever they took, had a care out of their Logic and Philosophy which they had by light of nature, to order the decrees divine, according to the common Rules of Art concerning intentions, as they are found to be either of some end, or of some means tending to an end, this seems to have been no part of Arminius his care. This order of his, I have ransacked in my Vindiciae. lib. 3. digress. 2. And if this Author think good, he may answer thereunto, and do his best to qualify the absurdities wherewith I charge that order of his.