A64002:137
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And as touching Piscator, he handles the question about the object of Predestination in a small Treatise, annexed to an answer of his to Hemingius, De Universali Gratiâ; and inquires whether the object thereof be Humanum genus nondum conditum, or conditum, but nondum corruptum, or both conditum and corruptum; and his resolution is, that in the decree of Predestination, there is place for all these considerations, according to three several acts comprised therein, which I have formerly mentioned, and so draws into one all three opinions.
And as touching Piscator, he handles the question about the object of Predestination in a small Treatise, annexed to an answer of his to Hemingius, De Universali Gratiâ; and inquires whether the obiect thereof be Humanum genus nondum conditum, or conditum, but nondum corruptum, or both conditum and corruptum; and his resolution is, that in the decree of Predestination, there is place for all these considerations, according to three severall acts comprised therein, which I have formerly mentioned, and so drawes into one all three opinious.
As touching Gomarus in the last place, I have seen little or nothing of his; but when Lubbertus in his Book Ad 99 Errores Conradi Vorstii pag. 807. had professed, Massam consideratam esse a Deo, non ut integram, sed ut corruptam; and was charged by Vostius as delivering that which was contrary to the doctrine of Calvin, Beza, and Gomarus, he replies that herein he doth not contradict them, but saith he, Illorum dict a quae quibusdam asperiuscula videntur, lenio, & in commodissimum sensum interpreter.
As touching Gomarus in the last place, I have seen little or nothing of his; but when Lubbertus in his Book Ad 99 Errores Conradi Vorstii pag. 807. had professed, Massam consideratam esse a Deo, non ut integram, sed ut corruptam; and was charged by Vostius as delivering that which was contrary to the doctrine of Calvin, Beza, and Gomarus, he replies that herein he doth not contradict them, but saith he, Illorum dict a quae quibusdam asperiuscula videntur, lenio, & in commodissimum sensum interpretor.