A64002:1422
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Of the five considerations proposed in this discourse, as it was first penned and transmitted to a friend, the fifth is changed and in the place thereof this inserted, and it concerns 1the third instance given of the Synodical Divines in the Synod of Dort. Now it is already showed in the answer to the former discourse how immodestly the Author carrieth himself, in charging that Synod with unwillingness to come to the trial, who justified their proceedings in the judgment of all the foreign Divines there present, for whereas the Remonstrants did once and again profess that they could not in conscience ⟨p. 20⟩any longer stay in the Synod, unless it were provided for, that they might treat of Election and reprobation. And that after that manner which they had set down in their Theses and writings exhibited to the Synod; hereupon the Synod to give them satisfaction herein ordered, that their opinion not only concerning Election, but also concerning reprobation should be weighed and examined: soe far forth as they in conscience should judge to be sufficient, for the glory of God, for the edifying and quieting of the Church and all mens consciences; but as touching the manner of proceeding herein, it pertained to them to consider and ordain as they thought good. And it became not those who where cited to appear, to prescribe unto the Synod. This decree being read the 40 session contains the altercation here abouts, between the Synod and them. They forsooth would prescribe to the Synod, de modo agendi; The Synod must not unto them.
Of the five considerations proposed in this discourse, as it was first penned and transmitted to a friend, the fifth is changed and in the place thereof this incerted, and it concernes 1the third instance given of the Synodicall Divines in the Synod of Dort. Now it is already shewed in the answer to the former discourse how immodestly the Authour carrieth himselfe, in charging that Synod with unwillingnesse to come to the triall, who justified their proceedings in the judgment of all the forraigne Divines there present, for whereas the Remonstrants did once and againe professe that they could not in conscience ⟨p. 20⟩