A64002:1459
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
As touching the Objection I hope this Author will say so too. As touching the first, 1namely, that he is the sovereign Lord of all creatures; and our Saviour Christ will say it for him, if he will not; as touching the last, namely, that it is lawful for him to do what he will with his own. But I find no need at all of this consideration, to make answer to his former vain discourse: for he may see plainly that I have made no use of these principles: but they have their place to justify God in other courses; namely, 1. In punishing children for the sin of their fathers in great variety of judgments temporal; as in the conflagration of Sodom, and in drowning of the old world. 2. In damning many Infant children of heathen men dying in original sin unremitted; as M. Mason in his lectures at Magdalen Hall maintained, that, the punishment of original sin unremitted was eternal damnation. And M. Hord confesseth as much in his preface, Sect: 4. 3. Yea and in making the Soul of Christ the holy Son of God an offering for the sins of others. But consider we his answer.
As touching the Objection I hope this Authour will say so too. As touching the first, 1namely, that he is the soveraigne Lord of all creatures; and our Saviour Christ will say it for him, if he will not; as touching the last, namely, that it is lawfull for him to doe what he will with his owne. But I find noe need at all of this consideration, to make answer to his former vaine discourse: for he may see plainly that I have made noe use of these principles: but they have their place to justifie God in other courses; namely, 1. In punishing children for the sinne of their fathers in great variety of judgments temporall; as in the conflagration of Sodome, and in drowning of the old world. 2. In damning many Infant children of heathen men dying in originall sinne unremitted; as M. Mason in his lectures at Magdalen Hall maintained, that, the punishment of originall sinne unremitted was eternall damnation. And M. Hord confesseth as much in his preface, Sect: 4. 3. Yea and in making the Soule of Christ the holy Sonne of God an offering for the sinnes of others. But consider we his answer.
- 1Reply.