A64002:1657
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
that is of necessity, by supposition, not necessity absolute. For as Aquinas hath delivered and proved, not only the things themselves come to pass by virtue of God's decree, but, modi rerum, several conditions of them. As for example, necessary things, necessarily; contingent things, contingently; free actions, freely; And that thus the things permitted do always come to pass, not only Piscator with our Divines, as Mr. Perkins, Doctor Whitaker and Pareus do avouch, but Vorstius also and Arminius, as I have showed in my Vindiciae, lib. 2. digres. 3. Arminius his words are these, if God permits a man to will this or ⟨p. 94⟩that, necesse est, it must needs be, ut nullo argumentorum genere persuadeatur ad nolendum, that no kind of argument move him to will it. Navarettus the Dominican professeth the same, in quaest. 19. pag. prima art. 6. pag. 65. col: 1.
that is of necessitie, by supposition, not necessity absolute. For as Aquinas hath delivered and proved, not only the things themselves come to passe by vertue of God's decree, but, modi rerum, severall conditions of them. As for example, necessary things, necessarily; contingent things, contingently; free actions, freely; And that thus the things permitted do alwaies come to passe, not only Piscator with our Divines, as Mr. Perkins, Doctor Whitaker and Pareus doe avouch, but Vorstius also and Arminius, as I have shewed in my Vindiciae, lib. 2. digres. 3. Arminius his words are these, if God permits a man to will this or ⟨p. 94⟩that, necesse est, it must needs be, ut nullo argumentorum genere persuadeatur ad nolendum, that no kind of argument move him to will it. Navarettus the Dominican professeth the same, in quaest. 19. pag. prima art. 6. pag. 65. col: 1.
1. That this distinction is rejected by our Divines this Author brings no tolerable evidence. As for Beza here it is confessed, that he acknowledgeth God to permit sin, and whereas he adds that he wills it too, it is nothing contradictory to the former. For to permit sin (speaking of permission divine) is to will that sin shall come to pass by God's permission. And Austin hath professed of those things that come to pass by God's