A64002:1783
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
For the good child is not obnoxious, and yet the good child is equally in the fathers loins with the bad, and equally receiveth nature and being from him. And then the Lord tells them expressly thus much in two propositions. ⟨p. 134⟩1. Affirmatively, The soul that sinneth it shall die. And that it may be known that he speaks exclusively, only the soul that sinneth shall dye; he delivers his mind. 2. Negatively, The Son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of her Son &c. Our Saviour in that woeful speech of his to the Pharisees, Fulfil ye also the measure of your fathers. Behold 1I send unto you Prophets. &c. them ye shall kill and crucify, that on you may come all the righteous blood. &c. Intimateth apparently, that the Pharisees were not inheritors of their fathers sins & punishments by birth; but by the commission and imitation of their fathers sins, they came to inherit both their sins and plagues. Miserable would our case be on whom the ends of the world are cone, if children should be guilty of all their Ancestors prevarications. What a world of sins should we be to answer for, personal sins, parents, progenitors sins, to a thousand past generations? A thing with no reason to be imagined. This is the first thing
For the good child is not obnoxious, and yet the good child is equally in the fathers loines with the bad, and equally receiveth nature and being from him. And then the Lord tells them expresly thus much in two propositions. ⟨p. 134⟩1. Affirmatively, The soule that sinneth it shall die. And that it may be known that he speaks exclusively, only the soule that sinneth shall dye; he delivers his mind. 2. Negatively, The Son shall not beare the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father beare the iniquity of her Sonne &c. Our Saviour in that woefull speech of his to the Pharisees, Fulfill ye also the measure of your fathers. Behold 1I send unto you Prophets. &c. them ye shall kill and crucifie, that on you may come all the righteous blood. &c. Intimateth apparently, that the Pharisees were not inheritours of their fathers sins & punishments by birth; but by the commission and imitation of their fathers sins, they came to inherit both their sins and plagues. Miserable would our case be on whom the ends of the world are cōe, if children should be guilty of all their Ancestours prevatications. What a world of sins should we be to answer for, personall sins, parents, progenitours sins, to a thousand past generations? A thing with no reason to be imagined. This is the first thing