A64002:1839
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
His making man's understanding purged from prejudice and false principles, as it was proposed there, purged from prejudices, corrupt affections, and customs, as it is proposed, to be the Tribunal, according to whose judgment interpretations of Scripture concerning what is just in the courses of God must be allowed or disallowed, I have sufficiently canvased there; Let the Reader be pleased to turn to it, and compare my answer to this Sub-section, and observe how little spirit he had, so much as to question against any one piece of my answer. Here he adds a reason of his former uncouth paradox, to wit that, Justice in men and God are for substance but one, and the same thing, though different in degree, as the greater and lesser light. I have sufficiently profligated this in the first Section concerning God's attributes. For this very rule he premiseth in general to the ensuing discourse of his, most congruously; wild premises and grounds to wild discourses.
His making man's understanding purged from prejudice and false principles, as it was proposed there, purged from prejudices, corrupt affections, and customes, as it is proposed, to be the Tribunall, according to whose judgment interpretations of Scripture concerning what is just in the courses of God must be allowed or disallowed, I have sufficiently canvased there; Let the Reader be pleased to turne to it, and compare my answer to this Sub-section, and observe how little spirit he had, so much as to question against any one peece of my answer. Here he addes a reason of his former uncouth paradoxe, to wit that, Iustice in men and God are for substance but one, and the same thing, though different in degree, as the greater and lesser light. I have sufficiently profligated this in the first Section concerning God's attributes. For this very rule he premiseth in generall to the ensuing discourse of his, most congruously; wilde premises and grounds to wild discourses.
The difference he puts between the ways of God & the mysteries of godliness I have there also refuted, showing that albeit some ways of God's justice are agreeable to the judgment of man, as these mentioned, Es: 5. and Ezek: 18, yet all are not, as there I show at large.