A64002:2019
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Resp. 1. In both Syllogisms the Minor we grant, the Major we deny, as being in 1effect the very same proposition which is in question; and all the evidence it carrieth with it consisteth in the parts which have a show of an Enthymeme thus:
Resp. 1. In both Syllogismes the Minor we grant, the Major we deny, as being in 1effect the very same proposition which is in question; and all the evidence it carryeth with it consisteth in the parts which have a shew of an Enthymeme thus:
- 1T.
1. Sin is necessarily prerequired to the pardoning of sin, therefore it is necessarily prerequired to the decree of pardoning sin.
1. Sinne is necessarily prerequired to the pardoning of sinne, therefore it is necessarily prerequired to the decree of pardoning sinne.
2. Sin in justice is prerequired unto punishing, Ergo 'tis in justice prerequired to the decree of punishing.
2. Sinne in justice is prerequired unto punishing, Ergo 'tis in justice prerequired to the decree of punishing.