A64002:2043
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Your third Syllogism addeth as little force unto the former, being merely identica probatio: For every man knoweth, that to be a sinner, and to have need to be delivered from sin is all one, in such sort as whatsoever is denied of a sinner, must be denied of him that hath need to be delivered from sin, forasmuch as every sinner hath need to be delivered from sin. Thus while you decline that proof, which in my observation, alone hath course, and the implication whereof in the Major proposition is all the evidence of it; you fall upon no sound proof at all. The truth is, if you observe, you may perceive your Major proposition involves this Enthymeme.
Your third Syllogisme addeth as little force unto the former, being meerly identica probatio: For every man knoweth, that to be a sinner, and to have need to be delivered from sinne is all one, in such sort as whatsoever is denyed of a sinner, must be denyed of him that hath need to be delivered from sinne, forasmuch as every sinner hath need to be delivered from sinne. Thus while you decline that proofe, which in my observation, alone hath course, and the implication whereof in the Major proposition is all the evidence of it; you fall upon no sound proofe at all. The truth is, if you observe, you may perceive your Major proposition involves this Enthymeme.
Liberation from sin presupposeth sin, sinners such as have need to be delivered from sin, Ergo, the decree of liberation from sin, presupposeth both sin and sinners, and such as need to be delivered from sin.
Liberation from sinne presupposeth sinne, sinners such as have need to be delivered from sinne, Ergo, the decree of liberation from sinne, presupposeth both sinne and sinners, and such as need to be delivered from sinne.
Of any other force of proof that you give, I am not conscious.