A64002:2077
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Resp. Hitherto you have discoursed as it were out of the month of our Divines; who yet as I have showed in my eighth Digression, are for the most part nothing for 1this opinion which you propose, being rightly understood. But in this point not one is for you; nor ever could I observe any of our Divines that maintained not the election of Angels, to be of as free grace as the election of men, or the reprobation of Angels, to be of as free Sovereignty and absoluteness in the denial of grace, as the reprobation of men.
Resp. Hitherto you have discoursed as it were out of the month of our Divines; who yet as I have shewed in my eighth Digression, are for the most part nothing for 1this opinion which you propose, being rightly understood. But in this point not one is for you; nor ever could I observe any of our Divines that maintained not the election of Angells, to be of as free grace as the election of men, or the reprobation of Angells, to be of as free Soveraignty and absolutenesse in the denyall of grace, as the reprobation of men.
- 1T.
Arminius never durst profess this which you do; but still puts it off as a matter he hath nothing to do withal, treating only of the predestination of men: which he would never have done, had he any hope to make good that opinion, which you seem more to incline unto, than to the contrary.
Arminius never durst professe this which you doe; but still puts it off as a matter he hath nothing to doe withall, treating onely of the predestination of men: which he would never have done, had he any hope to make good that opinion, which you seeme more to incline unto, than to the contrary.