A64002:2084
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But suppose you deny this; yet all confess no natural action can be wrought (much less gracious) without Gods concourse, as the efficient cause thereof. Now consider, doth God concur modo nos velimus, which is Suarius his devise? consider I pray you, the contradiction included in this Tenet: God is the cause working not only [Greek or Hebrew] perficere, but also [Greek or Hebrew] veil, as they confess: Now is it possible, that God concurreth ad velle modo nos velimus? can the same thing be the condition of it self? It may as well be before it self. Again, supposing we do veil, it is not possible by the power of God, that we should not veil: for factum infectum reddere me Deus quidem ⟨p. 197⟩potest. But this I have farther prosecuted in a Digression by it self, proving that God doth determine the will to every act thereof, and showing the great concurrence herein, (and upon what grounds) of school Divines, from Albertus Magnus his days downwards. But I proceed with you.
But suppose you deny this; yet all confesse no naturall action can be wrought (much lesse gratious) without Gods concourse, as the efficient cause thereof. Now consider, doth God concurre modo nos velimus, which is Suarius his devise? consider I pray you, the contradiction included in this Tenet: God is the cause working not onely 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 perficere, but also 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 velle, as they confesse: Now is it possible, that God concurreth ad velle modo nos velimus? can the same thing be the condition of it selfe? It may as well be before it selfe. Againe, supposing we doe velle, it is not possible by the power of God, that we should not velle: for factum infectum reddere me Deus quidem ⟨p. 197⟩potest. But this I have farther prosecuted in a Digression by it selfe, proving that God doth determine the will to every act thereof, and shewing the great concurrence herein, (and upon what grounds) of schoole Divines, from Albertus Magnus his dayes downwards. But I proceed with you.