A64002:2252
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Suarez also argueth to the same purpose.1
- 1Piaeterea declaratur hoc modo; quia vel Deus scit haec contingentia, quando ponuntar in esse, vel non: Hoc posterius nemo dicit, quia angelus, vel homo hoc cognoscit, saltem quando sunt prasentia: Ergo multo magis Deus: si autem nunc illa cognoscit, Ergo & antea, quia scientia Dei augeri non potest, Ita ut aliquid novum sub illam cadat, tum propter immutabilitatem, tum eriam quia panlatim discere, quocunque modo siat, magna imperfectio est; Confirmatur, quia si Deus in tempore aliquid de novo inciperet veil, imperfectionem in illo indicaret: Ergo multò magis •• aliquid de novo scire inciperet. Lib. 1. De Scientia••turorum contingentium absoluta. cap. 2.Piaeterea declaratur hoc modo; quia vel Deus scit haec contingentia, quando ponuntar in esse, vel non: Hoc posterius nemo dicit, quia angelus, vel homo hoc cognoscit, saltem quando sunt prasentia: Ergo multo magis Deus: si autem nunc illa cognoscit, Ergo & antea, quia scientia Dei augeri non potest, Ita ut aliquid novum sub illam cadat, tum propter immutabilitatem, tum eriam quia panlatim discere, quocunque modo siat, magna imperfectio est; Confirmatur, quia si Deus in tempore aliquid de novo inciperet velle, imperfectionem in illo indicaret: Ergo multò magis •• aliquid de novo scire inciperet. Lib. 1. De Scientia••turorum contingentium absoluta. cap. 2.
The last sort of arguments which I shall mention, are drawn from Gods actual providence or efficiency. God is the cause of all things, of him (saith the Apostle) are all things, Rom. 11. 36. Now he is the cause of all things by his knowledge, and by his will.