A64002:2281
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To make this matter more plain, I shall distinguish of a twofold acception of Univocal; one Logical, the other Metaphysical.
To make this matter more plaine, I shall distinguish of a twofold acception of Univocall; one Logicall, the other Metaphysicall.
First Logical, in which 'tis adequately opposed unto equivocal, and so every predicate is univocal, that is, not purely, & merely equivocal, which ⟨p. 234⟩imparts only its name, and not any common signification thereof. Predicates thus Univocal, are said to be Logically univocal, because this kind of univocation is sufficient as to Logical ends and purposes, as for the framing a contradiction, and to be the middle term in a demonstration.
First Logicall, in which 'tis adequately opposed unto equivocall, and so every predicate is univocall, that is, not purely, & meerly equivocall, which ⟨p. 234⟩imparts only its name, and not any common signification thereof. Predicates thus Univocall, are said to be Logically univocall, because this kind of univocation is sufficient as to Logicall ends and purposes, as for the framing a contradiction, and to be the middle terme in a demonstration.
Secondly, there is a Metaphysical acception of Univocal, in which 'tis inadequately opposed unto Equivocal, that is, partly unto Equivocal, and partly unto Analogical. An Equivocal predicate only imparts its name, and not any common signification thereof. An Analogical predicate imparts both its name and signification unto the things of which it is predicated, but unequally, in regard of that inequality, which is of essentiall dependency, secundum prius & posterius, as they say; so Ens is predicated of substance, and Accident; analogically of substance in the first place, and primarily, as its principal analogate; of Accident in the second place, with attribution, order, or reference unto, and dependence upon substance.