A64002:2283
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Secondly, there is a Metaphysical acception of Univocal, in which 'tis inadequately opposed unto Equivocal, that is, partly unto Equivocal, and partly unto Analogical. An Equivocal predicate only imparts its name, and not any common signification thereof. An Analogical predicate imparts both its name and signification unto the things of which it is predicated, but unequally, in regard of that inequality, which is of essentiall dependency, secundum prius & posterius, as they say; so Ens is predicated of substance, and Accident; analogically of substance in the first place, and primarily, as its principal analogate; of Accident in the second place, with attribution, order, or reference unto, and dependence upon substance.
Secondly, there is a Metaphysicall acception of Univocall, in which 'tis inadequately opposed unto Equivocall, that is, partly unto Equivocall, and partly unto Analogicall. An Equivocall predicate only imparts its name, and not any common signification thereof. An Analogicall predicate imparts both its name and signification unto the things of which it is predicated, but unequally, in regard of that inequality, which is of essentiall dependency, secundum prius & posterius, as they say; so Ens is predicated of substance, and Accident; analogically of substance in the first place, and primarily, as its principall analogate; of Accident in the second place, with attribution, order, or reference unto, and dependance upon substance.
These things thus premised, I lay down these two conclusions, against which whatsoever you object I shall be ready to answer.
These things thus premised, I lay downe these two conclusions, against which whatsoever you object I shall be ready to answer.
The first conclusion, Diverse attributes, which denominate God, and the Creature, are predicated of them univocally in a Logical acception of Univocal, as it is adequately opposed unto Equivocal; that is, they are not predicated of God, and the Creature, merely and purely Equivocally.