A64002:2284
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
These things thus premised, I lay down these two conclusions, against which whatsoever you object I shall be ready to answer.
These things thus premised, I lay downe these two conclusions, against which whatsoever you object I shall be ready to answer.
The first conclusion, Diverse attributes, which denominate God, and the Creature, are predicated of them univocally in a Logical acception of Univocal, as it is adequately opposed unto Equivocal; that is, they are not predicated of God, and the Creature, merely and purely Equivocally.
The first conclusion, Diverse attributes, which denominate God, and the Creature, are predicated of them univocally in a Logicall acception of Univocall, as it is adequately opposed unto Equivocall; that is, they are not predicated of God, and the Creature, meerely and purely Equivocally.
For first, not only the bare words, but a common and abstracted signification of them is found both in God and the Creature, I might instance in Ens, substance, goodness, wisdom, justice, &c.
For first, not only the bare words, but a common and abstracted signification of them is found both in God and the Creature, I might instance in Ens, substance, goodnesse, wisdome, justice, &c.