A64002:2309
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Unto these reasons I might add your own confession, I confess (say you) that no signification whatsoever, whether of what a man willeth or decreeth to be done, or of what is the duty of another to do, can properly be said 1to be the will of the signifier.
Unto these reasons I might adde your own confession, I confesse (say you) that no signification whatsoever, whether of what a man willeth or decreeth to be done, or of what is the duty of another to doe, can properly be said 1to be the will of the signifier.
- 1Praelatus enim religiosus quandoque praecipit subdito aliquid grave, volens eum per praeceptum ligare, & tamen nec vult, nec intendit, quod res quam praecipit fiat; unde cum subditus parat se ad exequendum praeceptum, Praelatus revocat; ita quod Praeceptur est directe signum voluntatis praecipientis quod velit obligari subditum ad exequ•ndum praeceptum, sed non est directe signum quod velit rem praeceptam impleri; talia enim praecepta sunt vel ad sumendum experimentum de obedientia subditi, vel ad ostendendum pluribus obedientiam unius quasi pro exemplo.
But now I subjoin, Gods precept or injunction is only a sign of his will, and therefore however it be usually termed in Scripture the will of God Mat. 6. 10. Mat. 7. 21. Rom. 12. 2. 1 Thess. 4. 3. It is to be understood only improperly and Tropically; and that first Metaphorically, 2. Metonymically.