A64002:2368
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
DR TWICE upon the Synod of Arles &c. Pag. 62, 63, 64.
DR TWISSE upon the Synod of Arles &c. Pag. 62, 63, 64.
I Deny that the Scripture ought with much more reason, or with any reason to say, that God would have all men to be damned, although put the case that in every Nation & condition there be more of these, than of them; and his reason drawn from the denomination to be taken from the major part is nothing to the present purpose. For the question here about the interpretation of Saint Pauls phrase is only this, whether the word All be to be interpreted of all sorts, or of all and every one; so that the rule of denomination taken from the major part is nothing pertinent to this, The question being only, whether genera singulorum, or singula generum be here meant, not whether some of all sorts, or all and every one of all sorts. Which being resolved, and that hereby is meant, genera singulorum, it may be farther questioned, whether genera singulorum do imply every particular of these kinds, or only some of them? For it is well known, that the phrase is indifferent to the one as well as the other, and that genera singulorum, are equally preserved entire in some particulars, as in many, or most, or all. Like as the Species of the Sun is maintained exactly as well in that one Sun, which shines by day in the firmament, as if there were twenty Suns.
I Deny that the Scripture ought with much more reason, or with any reason to say, that God would have all men to be damned, although put the case that in every Nation & condition there be more of these, than of them; and his reason drawne from the denomination to be taken from the major part is nothing to the present purpose. For the question here about the interpretation of Saint Pauls phrase is only this, whether the word All be to be interpreted of all sorts, or of all and every one; so that the rule of denomination taken from the major part is nothing pertinent to this, The question being only, whether genera singulorum, or singula generum be here meant, not whether some of all sorts, or all and every one of all sorts. Which being resolved, and that hereby is meant, genera singulorum, it may be farther questioned, whether genera singulorum doe imply every particular of these kinds, or only some of them? For it is well known, that the phrase is indifferent to the one as well as the other, and that genera singulorum, are equally preserved entire in some particulars, as in many, or most, or all. Like as the Species of the Sunne is maintained exactly as well in that one Sunne, which shines by day in the firmament, as if there were twenty Sunnes.