A64002:2383
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Thus you see, that notwithstanding your pleasure to say otherwise, it is not barely said but proved by him, that Christ prayed not for all his Crucifiers by virtue of his office as he was Mediator.
Thus you see, that notwithstanding your pleasure to say otherwise, it is not barely said but proved by him, that Christ prayed not for all his Crucifyers by vertue of his office as he was Mediator.
In the next place, that Christ according to the duty of a private man, might pray for all that crucified him, even for those of them that were not elect, is rendered probable by two arguments in D. Twice.
In the next place, that Christ according to the duty of a private man, might pray for all that crucified him, even for those of them that were not elect, is rendred probable by two arguments in D. Twisse.
The first is, Christs subjection unto the Law. Gal. 4. 4. He was made under the Law: and therefore bound to fulfil all righteousness. Math. 3. 15. And one branch of the Law, as is evident, by Christ his own gloss upon it, Math. 5. is to love our enemies, to forgive private & personal wrongs, to pray for them which despitefully use us, and persecute us. this was a point that he pressed much upon his Disciples in his life time, and it being a duty (though of frequent use) yet difficult and harsh unto flesh and blood, it is not unlikely but that he might exemplify it by his own practice at his death.